Markerless Video-Based Gait Analysis for Motor Phenotyping in Individuals with Schizophrenia Using Interpretable...

Background/Objectives: Motor abnormalities are frequently observed in schizophrenia, but accessible methods for objective gait quantification remain limited. This exploratory controlled-setting study examined whether markerless smartphone-based video analysis combined with interpretable machine learning could quantify gait-related motor phenotypes in individuals with schizophrenia. Methods: Gait videos were collected from 100 individuals with schizophrenia and 35 healthy controls using a single-site, single-device, standardized recording setup. MediaPipe Pose was used to extract skeletal landmarks and derive 12 image-plane spatiotemporal and estimated two-dimensional knee-kinematic gait features. After temporal segmentation and quality control, 404 usable gait segments derived from 135 participants were analyzed as repeated segment-level observations. Decision Tree and Support Vector Machine models were applied for exploratory segment-level group-separation analysis using segment-wise 15-fold cross-validation after the full post-quality-control dataset had been balanced before fold allocation. Results: Several extracted gait features differed between groups, particularly image-plane ankle displacement, mean step displacement, displacement velocity, step characteristics, and knee-joint motion. In the Decision Tree model, image-plane ankle displacement served as the primary root node, indicating its central role in internal segment-level group separation. However, the healthy control group was substantially younger and not age-matched. In addition, the segment-level statistical comparisons did not account for within-participant clustering. Accordingly, the reported p values and confidence intervals may overstate statistical precision. Separately, segment-wise cross-validation allowed segments from the same participant to occur across folds and resampling was performed before fold partitioning. Because oversampling was performed with replacement, duplicated segment instances could also occur across training and validation folds. Consequently, the statistical findings should be interpreted as exploratory segment-level patterns rather than participant-level inference, and the machine-learning performance estimates should be regarded only as potentially optimistic apparent internal segment-level results and should not be regarded as evidence of participant-level generalization, diagnostic validity, screening accuracy, or clinical applicability. Conclusions: Markerless video-based gait analysis with interpretable machine learning may provide a feasible research-support approach for quantifying gait-related motor phenotypes in individuals with schizophrenia. These findings should not be interpreted as evidence for participant-level clinical classification, diagnostic or screening validity, clinical utility, or readiness for deployment, or as proof of cross-device or cross-environment reproducibility. Future studies require matched controls, psychiatric comparison groups, subject-wise validation, external datasets, calibrated gait measures, systematic cross-configuration reproducibility testing, and privacy-preserving data governance.