Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 28, 2026

Preclinical Model of Prenatal Delta-9-Tetrahydrocannabinol Exposure to Assess Its Impact on Neurodevelopmental Outcomes
Published on: February 28, 2025
Medical Cannabis During Pregnancy and Breastfeeding: Is the Concern Fully Evidence-Based?
Miri Pevzner1, Dror Sasson1, Chen Porat2
1Department of Clinical Pharmacology, School of Pharmacy, Faculty of Health Sciences, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Beer-Sheva 8410501, Israel.
Abstract:
Medical cannabis use is steadily increasing worldwide, including among pregnant and breastfeeding women. This Perspective provides an overview of current evidence regarding cannabis exposure during pregnancy and lactation and its implications for clinical decision-making. The available literature indicates relatively consistent evidence linking prenatal Δ9-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) exposure with adverse perinatal outcomes, including reduced birth weight, increased risk of preterm delivery, and potential neurodevelopmental effects, although the findings remain heterogeneous and often confounded. In contrast, evidence regarding cannabis exposure during breastfeeding is sparse, and long-term infant outcomes associated with postnatal exposure through breast milk remain insufficiently characterized. Data on isolated cannabidiol (CBD) exposure during pregnancy and lactation are particularly limited, and most available evidence derives from preclinical studies or pharmacokinetic modeling rather than clinical outcome studies. Current recommendations from major health organizations uniformly advise avoiding cannabis and cannabinoid use during pregnancy and breastfeeding. This Perspective highlights the need to interpret the evidence according to cannabinoid type, exposure period, route and pattern of use, and the distinction between recreational exposure and regulated medical use. Such distinctions are particularly important because evidence is relatively stronger for prenatal THC exposure, whereas data on CBD and lactational exposure remain limited and are derived largely from indirect clinical, pharmacokinetic, and preclinical sources. Within this evidence landscape, individualized clinical interpretation may be needed when exposure has already occurred, cessation is not immediately feasible, or maternal treatment decisions remain complex, while remaining anchored in current avoidance recommendations.
Related Concept Videos
Upper Respiratory Drugs: Antitussives, Expectorants, and Mucolytics
Antitussives include codeine, dextromethorphan (Robitussin), and benzonatate (Tessalon). Codeine and dextromethorphan exert their effects centrally by suppressing the cough reflex center in the medulla. Benzonatate operates peripherally within the respiratory tract by anesthetizing...
Chemotherapy-Induced Nausea and Vomiting: Cannabinoids
Two synthetic agonists of THC,...
Drugs for Treatment of Constipation-Predominant IBS
Stimulants
Cocaine can be administered via snorting, injection, or smoking. It primarily functions by blocking the reuptake of dopamine, resulting in a euphoric high characterized by an intense sensation of happiness and...
Development of the Oral Microbiota
