Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 28, 2026

Confocal Time Lapse Imaging as an Efficient Method for the Cytocompatibility Evaluation of Dental Composites
Published on: November 9, 2014
Effects of Additive Incorporation on Fluoride Release of Orthodontic Glass Ionomer Cements and Adhesives: A
Wojciech Dobrzyński1, Sylwia Klimas2, Zuzanna Majchrzak3
1Department of Dentofacial Orthopedics and Orthodontics, Division of Facial Abnormalities, Wroclaw Medical University, Krakowska 26, 50-425 Wroclaw, Poland.
Abstract:
This systematic review evaluated the effects of functional additives on fluoride release, fluoride recharge/re-release, and selected mechanical, physical, and biological properties of orthodontic glass ionomer cements (GICs) and glass ionomer-based adhesives. The review followed PRISMA guidelines. The protocol was retrospectively registered in the Open Science Framework. PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, Embase, and WorldCat were searched for in vitro studies investigating modified orthodontic GICs and reporting fluoride-related or clinically relevant material properties. The final literature search was conducted on 30 April 2026. After screening 87 records, 23 studies were included in the qualitative synthesis. Owing to substantial methodological and outcome heterogeneity among the included studies, no meta-analysis was performed, and the findings were synthesized narratively. Risk of bias was assessed using the QUIN Tool; 20 studies were classified as having a medium risk of bias and three as having a low risk, while none were classified as having a high risk. The effects of additives on fluoride release varied according to additive type and concentration, material composition, storage conditions, pH, and evaluation period. Increases in fluoride release were reported in studies evaluating materials containing nCaF2, TMPnano, nanofluorapatite or nanofluorohydroxyapatite, hydroxyapatite, nanochitosan, SNP/ZnONP, and ZnSO4. Several additives maintained or improved mechanical performance, whereas higher concentrations of some agents adversely affected bond strength, microhardness, or material stability. Antibacterial and antibiofilm activity was most evident for CHX, DMAHDM, MDPB, propolis, silibinin, nanosilver, and zinc-containing systems. Limited evidence also suggested potential benefits regarding enamel protection and cytocompatibility. Functional additives may enhance the preventive potential of orthodontic GIC-based materials, particularly through improved fluoride release and antibacterial activity. However, further standardized long-term and clinical studies are required before clinical recommendations can be made.
Related Concept Videos
Additives and Fillers in Concrete
The...
Plasticizers
Plasticizers function by using surface-active agents to create repulsive electrostatic forces between cement particles. This dispersion enhances the concrete's...
