Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 29, 2026

Generation of CAR T Cells for Adoptive Therapy in the Context of Glioblastoma Standard of Care
Published on: February 16, 2015
Adaptive Bridging and Holding Therapy Frequently Reduces Tumor Burden and Is Associated With Reduced Toxicity After
Jule Cecilia Artzenroth1, Ricardo Kosch1, Maximilian Al-Bazaz1
1University Cancer Center Hamburg (UCCH), University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
Background:
Chimeric antigen receptor T-cell (CAR-T) therapy targeting B-cell maturation antigen (BCMA) has transformed the treatment of relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) but is associated with substantial toxicity. The association between preinfusion disease control and postinfusion toxicity remains underexplored, and no treatment standards exist for bridging therapy in RRMM.
Objective:
To characterize the holding and bridging regimens used in clinical practice, evaluate their effectiveness in achieving preinfusion disease response, and assess the association between the depth of preinfusion response and the incidence of postinfusion toxicity.
Study Design:
In this single-center retrospective analysis, 88 consecutive RRMM patients received idecabtagene vicleucel (n = 22) or ciltacabtagene autoleucel (n = 66). Preinfusion response was assessed using International Myeloma Working Group criteria. The primary endpoint was a composite of any ≥Grade 2 toxicity across 6 categories: cytokine release syndrome, immune effector cell associated neurotoxicity syndrome, immune effector cell-associated hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis-like syndrome, early and late immune effector cell-associated hematotoxicity, and infection, evaluated using log-link regression to estimate risk ratios (RR).
Results:
Among the 88 patients included in the analysis, the median number of prior lines of therapy was 4. Holding and bridging therapy were administered in 80 (90.9%) and 87 (98.9%) patients, respectively. Twenty-four different therapeutic regimens were administered. Among the 79 patients who received both holding and bridging therapy, 32 (40.5%) changed regimens after apheresis due to insufficient response. Overall, 60/88 patients (68.2%) achieved ≥ partial response before infusion. Patients achieving ≥ very good partial response (VGPR) had a composite ≥Grade 2 toxicity rate of 8/35 (22.9%) compared with 25/53 (47.2%) in those with
Conclusion:
Deeper preinfusion response was associated with significantly lower toxicity after BCMA-directed CAR-T therapy, identifying preinfusion disease control as a potentially modifiable determinant of toxicity. Intensified holding and bridging strategies were feasible and effective in reducing disease burden in highly pretreated patients, supporting prospective validation of response-adapted bridging to improve the safety of CAR-T therapy in RRMM.
Related Concept Videos
Tumor Immunotherapy
Targeted Cancer Therapies
There are several types of targeted therapies against specific...
Combination Therapies and Personalized Medicine
The combination of the drug acetazolamide and sulforaphane is a good example of combination therapy to treat cancer. The cells in the interior of a large tumor often die due to the hypoxic and...
Cancer Therapies
However, cancer treatments can pose several challenges, as therapies used to kill cancer cells are generally also toxic to normal cells. Moreover, cancer cells mutate rapidly and can develop resistance to chemical agents or radiation therapy. Besides, all types of cancer cells may not respond to the same therapy. Some cancer cells respond to one...
Bone Marrow Sampling and Transplants
The transplant begins with high doses of chemotherapy and radiation treatment, which aim to destroy the...
![Dynamic Imaging of Chimeric Antigen Receptor T Cells with [18F]Tetrafluoroborate Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography](/_next/image?url=https%3A%2F%2Fcloudfront.jove.com%2FCDNSource%2Fteasers%2F62334.jpg&w=3840&q=50)