Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 29, 2026

Reduced Procedure Time and Variability with Active Esophageal Cooling During Radiofrequency Ablation for Atrial Fibrillation
Published on: August 25, 2022
Anaesthetic Techniques for Cardiac Ablation-A Scoping Review
Mathilde Bang Fredensborg1,2, Anne Færgemand Præstegaard2, Sebastian Bach Fiege1
1Herlev Anaesthesia Critical and Emergency Care Science Unit (ACES), Department of Anaesthesiology, Copenhagen University Hospital - Herlev and Gentofte Hospital, Herlev, Denmark.
Background:
Cardiac arrhythmias, particularly atrial fibrillation, have rising prevalence and represent a growing global health burden. Catheter ablation is a commonly used treatment demanding sedation or anaesthesia for comfort, stability and safety. Anaesthetic techniques vary globally, and the optimal strategy has yet to be determined. The objective of this scoping review was to map the current literature on anaesthesia for catheter ablation, identifying how it has been investigated and which evidence gaps exist.
Methods:
This scoping review followed a pre-published protocol and guidelines. A search was conducted in MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane, Google Scholar, and Scopus, with no restrictions on publication year or language. Eligible studies were primary studies involving adult patients undergoing catheter ablation in hospitals, clinics, or similar healthcare facilities.
Results:
We included 110 studies published between 1991 and 2025. The reported anaesthetic techniques included General Anaesthesia (GA), Deep Sedation (DS), Conscious Sedation (CS), Minimal Sedation, and Local Anaesthesia (LA). Complications were infrequently reported, recovery was comparable, and patient and operator satisfaction was high across techniques. Techniques varied across regions, with GA being most frequent in North America, GA and CS in Asia, and DS in Europe. Anaesthesia quality was commonly assessed by intraprocedural respiratory and haemodynamic stability and complication rates, whilst anaesthesia effectiveness was mostly assessed using procedure duration, accumulated medication, sedation depth, and sedation failure/escalation.
Conclusion:
This scoping review mapped current anaesthetic practices in catheter ablations. GA, DS, and CS were most frequently reported. Complications were infrequent and satisfaction high. However, evidence gaps and inconsistent definitions and assessment methods highlight the need for future research and standardisation.
Editorial Comment:
Electrophysiological cardiac interventions such as catheter ablations commonly now also involve anaesthesiological management. This scoping review presents an update on knowledge for how this care may facilitate good procedural results.
Related Concept Videos
General Anesthesia: Overview
General anesthesia induces unconsciousness in the whole body, while the others target specific areas or sensations. It is administered to minimize adverse effects, maintain...
Local Anesthetics: Clinical Application as Intravenous Regional Anesthesia
One of the advantages of...
Local Anesthetics: Clinical Application as Spinal Anesthesia
Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation IV: Pharmacological Management
Parenteral Anesthetics: Overview
Inhalational Anesthetics: Overview

