Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Newer experimental methods for classifying depression. A report from the NIMH collaborative pilot study.

N C Andreasen, G Winokur

    Archives of General Psychiatry
    |April 1, 1979
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    Cross-cultural psychotherapy. M. M. Bishop and G. Winokur (1956). Reprinted from the J Nerv Ment Dis. 123: 369-375.

    The Journal of nervous and mental disease·2012
    Same author

    Alcoholism and drug abuse in three groups--bipolar I, unipolars and their acquaintances.

    Journal of affective disorders·1998
    Same author

    Failure to demonstrate parent-of-origin effect in transmission of bipolar II disorder.

    Journal of affective disorders·1998
    Same author

    Effect of antipsychotics on regional cerebral blood flow measured with positron emission tomography.

    Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology·1997
    Same author

    Quantitative analysis of leukocyte mitochondrial DNA deletion in affective disorders.

    Biological psychiatry·1997
    Same author

    All roads lead to depression: clinically homogeneous, etiologically heterogeneous.

    Journal of affective disorders·1997
    Same journal

    Reviewers Who Completed a Review During 2011.

    Archives of general psychiatry·2017
    Same journal

    Conflicts of interest-reply.

    Archives of general psychiatry·2013
    Same journal

    Epidemiologic evidence concerning the bereavement exclusion in major depression-reply.

    Archives of general psychiatry·2013
    Same journal

    This month in archives of general psychiatry.

    Archives of general psychiatry·2013
    Same journal

    About this journal.

    Archives of general psychiatry·2013
    Same journal

    This month in archives of general psychiatry.

    Archives of general psychiatry·2013
    See all related articles

    This study evaluated new ways to classify major depressive disorder based on family history and course. While promising, these methods require further research for widespread acceptance in diagnosing depression.

    Area of Science:

    • Psychiatry
    • Clinical Psychology
    • Genetics

    Background:

    • Major depressive disorder classification is complex.
    • Existing classification systems may benefit from refinement.
    • Family history and illness course are potential discriminators for depressive subtypes.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To evaluate the validity of two novel classification systems for major depressive disorder.
    • To compare these systems with established classifications, including Winokur's subtypes and primary vs. secondary depression.
    • To assess the predictive, construct, and content validity of the new classification methods.

    Main Methods:

    • Utilized data from 83 patients diagnosed with major depressive disorder in a pilot study.
    • Compared a nonfamilial depression subtype with Winokur's pure depression and depression spectrum diseases.

    Related Experiment Videos

  • Assessed a classification system based on course and antecedent disorder (primary vs. secondary depression).

    • Main Results:

    • The two newer classification systems demonstrated some predictive, construct, and content validity.
    • Nonfamilial depression showed distinct characteristics compared to Winokur's subtypes.
    • Primary vs. secondary depression classification also yielded comparable results.

    Conclusions:

    • The evaluated classification systems for major depressive disorder show potential.
    • Further investigation is necessary to validate these methods for clinical acceptance.
    • Refined classification may improve understanding and treatment of depressive disorders.