Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 30, 2026

Metagenomic Analysis of Silage
Published on: January 13, 2017
Metagenomic characterization of potential exposure to genetic hazards at the interface between grazing livestock and
Qingshan Fan1, Jie Bai1, Xiaoli Wang2
1Pratacultural College, Key Laboratory of Grassland Ecosystem (Ministry of Education), Gansu Agricultural University, Lanzhou, 730070, China.
Abstract:
Livestock and endangered wildlife increasingly share grazing landscapes, yet the sources, mobility-associated contexts, and bacterial hosts of livestock-associated genetic hazards in wildlife microbiomes remain poorly resolved. We analyzed metagenomes from yak, Tibetan sheep, Przewalski's gazelle, and local topsoil within an Acquired Genetic Risk (AGR) conceptual framework integrating genetic hazard burden, compositional source attribution, mobility-associated evidence, and bacterial genomic context. MRGs and Rank I and Rank III ARGs were more abundant in livestock than in Przewalski's gazelle, whereas VF abundance was highest in yak. FEAST attributed approximately 64% of the Przewalski's gazelle resistome composition to the two livestock source profiles, less than 1% to sampled topsoil, and approximately 36% remained unassigned. MGE profiles were associated with ARGs, MRGs, and VFs, while tnpA ranked highest in random forest models and was associated with total ARG abundance (R2 = 0.618). Short-read contigs containing hazard genes and MGE markers provided localized mobility-associated sequence context. Genome-resolved analysis identified distinct bacterial contexts: TS.Bin143, an Escherichia coli MAG from Tibetan sheep, contained ARGs, MRGs, VFs, tnpA, and IS91, whereas PG.Bin275, a Hylemonella sp. MAG from Przewalski's gazelle, contained tnpA. These findings extend wildlife resistome assessment beyond abundance profiling toward source attribution, mobility-associated sequence context, and bacterial host resolution, supporting multilevel surveillance of genetic hazard exposure at livestock-wildlife interfaces.
Related Concept Videos
Background and Environment Affect Phenotype
An example of how genetic background affects phenotype can be seen in horses. The Extension gene in horses is responsible for their coat color. A wild-type gene (EE) produces black pigment in the coat, while a mutant gene (ee) produces red pigment. A...
Genome-wide Association Studies-GWAS
GWAS does not require the identification of the target gene involved in...
Gene Flow
Hybrid Zones
