Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 31, 2026

Improved Renal Denervation Mitigated Hypertension Induced by Angiotensin II Infusion
Published on: May 26, 2022
Device and Patient-Related Complications of Renal Denervation for Uncontrolled Hypertension: A Post-Marketing
Sai Tharun Reddy Gopannagari1, Kesava Manikanta Achuta1, Divya Ganisetti2
1Department of Internal Medicine Garden City Hospital, Michigan, USA.
Introduction:
Renal denervation (RDN) has re-emerged as an adjunctive therapy for uncontrolled hypertension following recent U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approvals of ultrasound- and radiofrequency-based systems. Although randomized trials report a favorable safety profile, post-marketing data may reveal additional safety signals in real-world settings.
Methods:
We performed a retrospective descriptive observational study of reports in the FDA Manufacturer and User Facility Device Experience (MAUDE) database from inception through December 22, 2025, which represented the final date of data extraction. Reports were identified using product code "QYI" and brand names "Paradise" and "Symplicity Spyral." Eligible reports describing RDN for hypertension management were manually reviewed and categorized as vascular, device-related, hemodynamic/arrhythmic, neurologic, or other events.
Results:
A total of 33 reports were identified, including 19/33 (57.6%) involving the Paradise system and 14/33 (42.4%) involving the Symplicity Spyral system. Vascular complications were the most frequently reported events, accounting for 15/33 reports (45.5%), including renal artery dissection (5/33, 15.2%), thrombosis (3/33, 9.1%), vasospasm (3/33, 9.1%), pseudoaneurysm (2/33, 6.1%), renal hematoma (1/33, 3.0%), and acute limb ischemia (1/33, 3.0%). Device-related events accounted for 10/33 reports (30.3%), most commonly expired catheter use (4/33, 12.1%) and catheter or component malfunction (6/33, 18.2%). Hemodynamic/arrhythmic events occurred in 4/33 reports (12.1%), neurologic events in 2/33 (6.1%), and other events accounted for 2/33 reports (6.1%).
Conclusions:
In this descriptive MAUDE analysis, RDN was associated with uncommon but clinically relevant vascular and device-related adverse events in real-world practice. These findings support continued post-marketing surveillance as use of RDN expands. Interpretation is limited by the passive nature of MAUDE reporting, including underreporting, incomplete data, and the inability to determine incidence or causality.
Related Concept Videos
Heart Failure Drugs: Inhibitors of Renin-Angiotensin System
Antihypertensive Drugs: Direct Renin Inhibitors
Renal Failure: Dose Adjustments
Reduced renal clearance and elimination rate are common outcomes of renal impairment. These alterations lead to a prolonged elimination half-life and an altered apparent volume of distribution for drugs. As a result, dosage adjustments are typically necessary to maintain optimal drug levels in the body.
However, dosage adjustments...
Hemodialysis II: Procedure and Complications
Diabetic Nephropathy
Hemodialysis III: Nursing Management
