Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 2, 2026

A Tactile Automated Passive-Finger Stimulator (TAPS)
Published on: June 3, 2009
Risk-aware multiple-choice question answering with conformal P-values
Wenwen Fu1,2, Yuanchang Ye3, Ganggang Yang4
1Department of Clinical Nutrition, The Sixth Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
Abstract:
Multiple-choice question answering (MCQA) systems are often required to act on uncertain evidence while still providing a concise decision to a user. We introduce a risk-aware MCQA interface that converts normalized option probabilities into conformal prediction sets, allowing the system to retain every answer option supported at a user-selected risk level. The option-wise conformal p-value provides an interpretable rank-based view of this decision. Across five instruction-tuned language models and common-question subsets of MMLU and MMLU-Pro, the procedure is evaluated with 100 random 1:1 calibration-test splits at target miscoverage levels [Formula: see text]. At [Formula: see text], mean empirical miscoverage ranges from 0.0390 to 0.0399 on MMLU and from 0.0469 to 0.0487 on MMLU-Pro; the same target-tracking pattern persists at the larger operating points and across diverse subjects. Prediction sets contract smoothly as the allowable risk increases, while the more demanding MMLU-Pro questions retain broader sets. These results position conformal p-values as a practical reliability layer for MCQA systems that must communicate calibrated ambiguity rather than conceal it behind a single top-ranked answer.
Related Concept Videos
Decision Making: P-value Method
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is proposed. The claim is based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to the claim is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses: a null hypothesis would be a neutral statement while the alternative hypothesis can have a...
Routh-Hurwitz Criterion I
To apply the Routh-Hurwitz criterion, a Routh table is constructed. The table's rows are labeled with powers of the complex frequency variable s, starting from the...
Routh-Hurwitz Criterion II
The first scenario occurs when a singular zero appears in the first column of the Routh table. This situation creates a division by zero issues. To resolve this, a small positive or negative number, denoted as epsilon (∈), is substituted for the zero. The stability analysis proceeds by assuming a sign for ∈. If ∈ is positive, any sign change in the first column of the Routh...
Testing a Claim about Population Proportion
There are two methods of testing a claim about a population proportion: (1) Using the sample proportion from the data where a binomial distribution is approximated to the normal distribution and (2) Using the binomial probabilities calculated from the data.
The first method uses normal distribution as an approximation to the binomial distribution. The requirements are as follows: sample size is large...
Response Surface Methodology
The process of RSM involves several key steps:
Critical Region, Critical Values and Significance Level
In hypothesis testing, a sample statistic is converted to a test statistic using z, t, or chi-square distribution. A critical region is an area under the curve in probability distributions demarcated by the critical value. When the test statistic falls in this region, it suggests that the null hypothesis must be rejected. As this region contains all those values of the test...
