Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 2, 2026
Magnetic Resonance Imaging Quantification of Pulmonary Perfusion using Calibrated Arterial Spin Labeling
Published on: May 30, 2011
Pre-Scan Breathing Pattern and Image Quality in Respiratory-Triggered T2-Weighted Liver MRI: Radial Versus Cartesian
Ho Sung Park1, Jimi Huh1,2, Kyungmin Lee1
1Department of Radiology, Ajou University Medical Center, Suwon, Republic of Korea.
Background:
Respiratory-triggered T2-weighted imaging (T2WI) may use rectilinear sampling (respiratory-triggered fast recovery fast spin echo [RT-FRFSE]) or radial sampling (periodically rotated overlapping parallel lines with enhanced reconstruction [PROPELLER]). Their relative performance across breathing patterns is unclear.
Purpose:
To compare image quality of PROPELLER and RT-FRFSE according to pre-scan breathing pattern.
Study Type:
Retrospective.
Subjects:
200 patients undergoing liver MRI (124 males; mean age, 58.1 ± 13.3 years).
Field Strength/Sequence:
1.5 T; fat-suppressed T2WI using PROPELLER and RT-FRFSE, both respiratory-triggered.
Assessment:
Patients were stratified by pre-scan respiratory rate and regularity: Group A (regular, ≤ 14 breaths/min, n = 49), B (15-17, n = 57), C (≥ 18, n = 49), D (irregular, n = 45). Three radiologists, blinded to respiratory group, graded ghost artifacts, sharpness, noise, and overall quality on five-point scales. Liver signal-to-noise (SNR) and liver-to-gallbladder contrast-to-noise ratios (CNR) were measured.
Statistical Tests:
Wilcoxon signed-rank test with Holm correction; Kruskal-Wallis analysis of within-patient difference scores and a linear mixed-effects model for SNR/CNR interactions; quadratic weighted kappa and intraclass correlation coefficient for interobserver agreement. p < 0.05 indicated significance.
Results:
In Groups A and B, RT-FRFSE scored higher qualitatively, except ghost artifacts in Group A (p = 0.197). In Groups C and D, PROPELLER was superior (overall quality 3.96 vs. 3.41 and 3.93 vs. 3.01). Quantitatively (PROPELLER vs. RT-FRFSE), median SNR was 79.2 vs. 95.6 (A) and 70.0 vs. 58.6 (C), and median CNR 57.6 vs. 64.4 (A) and 55.5 vs. 42.7 (D); SNR did not differ in Groups B (p = 0.504) or D (p = 0.480), and CNR did not differ in Groups B or C (both p = 1.000). Interobserver agreement was substantial to almost perfect (kappa: 0.64-0.83; ICC: 0.89-0.93).
Data Conclusion:
RT-FRFSE performed better with slower, regular breathing and PROPELLER with faster or irregular breathing. Pre-scan respiratory assessment may inform sequence selection.
Evidence Level:
3.
Technical Efficacy:
Stage 1.
Related Concept Videos
01:24Magnetic Resonance Imaging
01:30Radiological Investigation II: MRI and Ventilation Perfusion Scan
Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) and Ventilation Perfusion Scans are two radiological investigations that offer detailed diagnostic images of the body, particularly lung structures.
MRI
MRI uses magnetic fields and radiofrequency signals to distinguish between normal and abnormal tissues. This technology provides a more detailed diagnostic image than CT scans, enabling it to characterize pulmonary nodules, stage bronchogenic carcinoma, and evaluate inflammatory activity in...
01:21Imaging Studies for Cardiovascular System IV: CMRI