Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 3, 2026

Fear Incubation Using an Extended Fear-Conditioning Protocol for Rats
Published on: August 22, 2020
Spatio-temporal Dynamics of Safety Learning, Discrimination, and Anticipation during Fear Acquisition and Fear
Ying Mei1, Yixue Lou2, Susannah Otieno-Leppänen3
1Department of Psychology, University of Jyväskylä, Jyväskylä, FI-40014, Finland; Centre of Excellence in Learning Dynamics and Intervention Research (InterLearn), Faculty of Education and Psychology, University of Jyväskylä , Jyväskylä, FI-40014, Finland; University of Turku, Turku, FI-20014, Finland; Department of Brain and Psychological Sciences, Sichuan Normal University,610066, China.
Abstract:
Existing neural studies have predominantly focused on threat processing during fear acquisition and generalization, whereas the spatiotemporal dynamics of safety learning remain poorly understood. Here, we examined safety learning across early acquisition, late acquisition, and fear generalization, while characterizing early and late event-related potential (ERP) responses using a fear conditioning and generalization paradigm with multiple conditioning sets (N = 29). Behavioral ratings and reaction times indicated enhanced safety learning from early to late acquisition, together with a generalization gradient from threat to safety stimuli. Non-parametric cluster-based permutation tests (CBPT) revealed larger frontal N2 amplitudes to the safety cue than the threat cue across all experimental phases. During fear generalization, both the safety cue and the generalization stimuli (GS1-GS4) elicited larger occipital P2 amplitudes than the threat cue. The safety cue further elicited larger right frontocentral late positive potential (LPP) amplitudes than the threat cue and the generalization stimuli, as well as larger sustained anterior negativity (SAN) than the generalization stimuli. Descriptive source reconstruction suggested shifts in the estimated sources of the N2 from early to late acquisition, whereas source estimates of the P2, LPP, and SAN showed spatial overlap with medial prefrontal, limbic subcortical, occipitotemporal, medial temporal, medial parietal, and cerebellar regions. Together, these findings provide a preliminary characterization of the spatiotemporal dynamics of safety learning across fear acquisition and generalization and establish a normative framework for future investigations of altered safety learning in anxiety disorders.
Related Concept Videos
Generalization, Discrimination, and Extinction
Generalization occurs when a behavior reinforced in one context is performed in similar situations. For instance, a student who studies diligently for calculus and receives excellent grades might apply the same study habits to psychology and history, expecting similar results. Generalization shows how learning in one setting can influence behavior in...
Preparedness and Phobias
Associative Learning
Classical conditioning, also known...
Avoidance Learning and Learned Helplessness
Avoidance learning occurs when an organism learns that a specific behavior can prevent an unpleasant outcome. For example, a student who receives a bad grade may start studying harder to avoid future poor grades. This behavior persists even when the negative outcome is no longer present. Avoidance learning is powerful because it maintains behavior in the absence of the...
Classical Conditioning in Daily Life
John B. Watson and Rosalie Rayner famously demonstrated the development of fear through classical conditioning in their experiment with Little Albert. They paired the...
Principles of Classical Conditioning
During the...

