Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 4, 2026

Characterize Disease-related Mutants of RAF Family Kinases by Using a Set of Practical and Feasible Methods
Published on: July 17, 2019
The association of NRAS and BRAF mutations with overall survival and surgical outcomes in stage IV colorectal cancer
Sarah E Rudasill1, Rebecca B Tang1, Aparna Parikh2
1Department of Surgery, Mass General Brigham, Boston, MA, United States.
Background:
NRAS and BRAF mutations occur in approximately 5% and 12% of colorectal cancers, respectively, but their prognostic significance in stage IV disease remains unclear. We hypothesized that NRAS and BRAF mutations confer worse survival and surgical outcomes, with effects modified by tumor location and microsatellite instability (MSI).
Methods:
We conducted a retrospective cohort study using the National Cancer Database (2021-2023) of adults with clinical stage IV colorectal cancer, stratified by NRAS and BRAF mutation status. A subset analysis included patients who underwent surgical resection. The primary outcome was 2-year overall survival; a secondary outcome was positive surgical margins. Cox proportional hazards and logistic regression were used to analyze survival and surgical outcomes.
Results:
Of 22,595 patients, 77.1% had no mutation, 15.3% had BRAF mutations, 6.2% had NRAS mutations, and 1.5% had concurrent mutations. BRAF-mutant tumors were more often right-sided (51.2% vs 26.0%; P <.001) and exhibited MSI (28.8% vs 4.6%; P <.001), whereas NRAS-mutant tumors resembled those without mutations. On multivariable analysis, NRAS mutations (hazard ratio [HR], 1.13; 95% CI, 1.01-1.26; P =.04), concurrent mutations (HR, 1.29; 95% CI, 1.05-1.60; P =.02), and BRAF mutations (HR, 1.87; 95% CI, 1.73-2.02; P <.001) were associated with increased 2-year mortality. MSI status modified this effect, with MSI/BRAF-mutant tumors associated with lower mortality (HR, 0.54; P <.001), whereas a right-sided tumor location independently predicted increased mortality (HR, 1.38; P <.001). Only BRAF-mutant tumors were associated with an increased risk of positive surgical margins (odds ratio, 1.52; P <.001).
Conclusion:
BRAF mutations confer worse survival and poorer surgical outcomes than NRAS mutations. MSI modifies BRAF-associated risk, whereas a right-sided location independently predicts survival. These findings refine risk stratification and surgical decision-making.
More Related Videos
06:44Bioluminescence Resonance Energy Transfer (BRET)-Based Assay for Measuring Interactions of CRAF with 14-3-3 Proteins in Live Cells
Published on: March 1, 2024
06:46Competing-Risk Nomogram for Predicting Cancer-Specific Survival in Multiple Primary Colorectal Cancer Patients after Surgery
Published on: September 27, 2024
Related Concept Videos
The Ras Gene
Ras is a superfamily...
mTOR Signaling and Cancer Progression
The mTOR pathway or the...
Abnormal Proliferation
Rous Sarcoma Virus (RSV) and Cancer
RSV is a retrovirus that contains two copies of a plus-strand RNA genome. Its genome consists of four main open...
Cancer Survival Analysis