Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 5, 2026

Spatiotemporally Controlled Nuclear Translocation of Guests in Living Cells Using Caged Molecular Glues as Photoactivatable Tags
Published on: January 17, 2019
A Molecular Mechanistic Deep Dive into 14-3-3 Molecular Glue Cooperativity
Marloes A M Pennings1, Edmee M F Vandenboorn-Bönner1, Lisa Nooren1
1Laboratory of Chemical Biology, Department of Biomedical Engineering and Institute for Complex Molecular Systems (ICMS), Eindhoven University of Technology, Eindhoven5600MB, The Netherlands.
Abstract:
Molecular glues (MGs) stabilize protein-protein interactions (PPIs) through interactions at composite binding interfaces, thereby promoting cooperative ternary complex formation. For hub proteins that engage in multiple PPIs with widely varying intrinsic affinities, the interplay between binary PPI affinity and MG cooperativity is therefore a key determinant of selective stabilization. Here, we use the multiclient 14-3-3 scaffold protein as a model system to systematically dissect the relationship between binary 14-3-3/client affinity (KDI) and MG-induced cooperativity (α). Client peptide affinity was systematically tuned by modifying residues N-terminal to the phosphorylated 14-3-3 binding motif while preserving the C-terminal composite interface required for MG recognition. Using a combination of biophysical techniques and protein crystallography, we show that changes in KDI alter the thermodynamic and kinetic parameters of both binary and ternary complex formation, but do not affect MG cooperativity. This principle was observed for the noncovalent MG fusicoccin-A as well as covalent MGs targeting 14-3-3σ/client complexes. Competitive binding experiments and thermodynamic modeling further revealed that, although α is independent of KDI, the interplay between KDI, MG affinity (KDII), and cooperativity determines which PPIs are preferentially stabilized in a multiclient environment. Together, these findings establish cooperativity, intrinsic PPI affinity, and MG affinity as key parameters governing MG activity and selectivity, providing a framework for the rational design of MGs targeting hub protein interactomes.
More Related Videos
08:34OaAEP1-Mediated Enzymatic Synthesis and Immobilization of Polymerized Protein for Single-Molecule Force Spectroscopy
Published on: February 5, 2020
09:15Measuring Biomolecular DSC Profiles with Thermolabile Ligands to Rapidly Characterize Folding and Binding Interactions
Published on: November 21, 2017
Related Concept Videos
Cooperative Allosteric Transitions
Cooperative Allosteric Transitions
Cooperative Allosteric Transitions
Noncovalent Attractions in Biomolecules
Four types of noncovalent interactions are hydrogen bonds, van der Waals forces, ionic bonds, and hydrophobic interactions.
Hydrogen bonding results from the electrostatic attraction of a hydrogen atom covalently bonded to a strong-electronegative atom like oxygen,...
Noncovalent Attractions in Biomolecules
Four types of noncovalent interactions are hydrogen bonds, van der Waals forces, ionic bonds, and hydrophobic interactions.
Hydrogen bonding results from the electrostatic attraction of a hydrogen atom covalently bonded to a strong-electronegative atom like oxygen,...
Introduction to Mechanisms of Enzyme Catalysis