Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 5, 2026

The Participant-Reported Implementation Update and Score (PRIUS): A Novel Method for Capturing Implementation-Related Data Over Time
Published on: February 19, 2021
A qualitative analysis to identify implementation strategies for a deprescribing clinical practice guideline using
Hui Wen Quek1, Xisco Reus2, Kenneth Lee2
1Centre for Optimisation of Medicines, School of Health and Clinical Sciences, The University of Western Australia, 35 Stirling Highway, Crawley, Perth, WA, 6009, Australia. amanda.quek@uwa.edu.au.
Introduction:
Deprescribing is the planned withdrawal or dose reduction of medicines when harms outweigh benefits or when they are no longer required. Following publication of the Clinical Practice Guideline for Deprescribing in Older People in September 2025, supporting its uptake into routine practice is a critical next step.
Aim:
This study aimed to identify implementation strategies, informed by stakeholder-perceived barriers, to support the implementation of deprescribing guidelines.
Method:
A qualitative analysis was undertaken of open-text responses collected during the guideline public consultation (24 April-31 May 2025). Inductive thematic analysis identified implementation barriers, which were then deductively mapped to the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR). Relevant CFIR constructs were entered into the CFIR-Expert Recommendations for Implementing Change (ERIC) Matching Tool to generate implementation strategies. Strategies were ranked by cumulative percentage endorsement and grouped using ERIC concept-mapping clusters.
Results:
Of 313 survey respondents, 248 provided responses relevant to implementation. Three barrier themes were shared across consumer and professional/policy stakeholder groups. Theme 1: 'Knowledge gaps, beliefs, and limited readiness to deprescribe' describes gaps in consumers' and clinicians' knowledge, beliefs about medication use and deprescribing, and limited confidence or willingness to engage in deprescribing. Theme 2: 'Communication, hierarchy, or social influences limiting deprescribing' describes communication gaps, entrenched prescribing norms, power imbalances, and social influences that limited shared decision-making. Theme 3: 'System-level structures misaligned with deprescribing practice' describes broader healthcare system barriers, including financial, policy, workforce, organisational, and information-related constraints. Consumers additionally highlighted a lack of person-centred and adaptable approach for deprescribing, while professional/policy stakeholders identified barriers related to medicine formulations and guideline format and usability. Barriers mapped predominantly to the CFIR Inner Setting domain. The highest-ranked implementation strategy was 'Identify and prepare champions', within the 'Develop stakeholder interrelationships' cluster.
Conclusion:
Deprescribing barriers were largely situated within the Inner Setting domains. Recommended strategies emphasised stakeholder engagement and local champions, supporting locally led, relationship-based implementation approaches. Future work should evaluate the feasibility, acceptability, and effectiveness of these strategies in practice.
Related Concept Videos
Ethical Dilemmas II
Methods of Documentation VI: Case Management Model
For example, a patient with a chronic illness...
Methods of Documentation V: CBE
In CBE, healthcare professionals establish predefined standards of practice that define what constitutes...
Acute Coronary Syndrome IV: Interprofessional Care
Methods of Documentation IV: Focus Charting
It typically involves three columns for recording information:
Techniques of Therapeutic Communication II: Focusing, Paraphrasing, and Summarizing
This therapeutic technique can also be used when a patient brings up pertinent information during a health-related conversation. The...