Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 5, 2026

Driving Under the Influence: How Music Listening Affects Driving Behaviors
Published on: March 27, 2019
Analyzing transitions, safety and influencing factors of driving patterns as multivariate short-term behaviors in
Xuesong Wang1, Xianhui Liu1, Qiming Guo2
1The Key Laboratory of Road and Traffic Engineering, Ministry of Education, Shanghai 201804, China; School of Transportation Engineering, Tongji University, Shanghai 201804, China.
Abstract:
Freeway diverging areas require drivers to decelerate, change lanes, and observe traffic simultaneously, resulting in elevated crash risk compared to basic segments. Previous studies have mainly focused on isolated maneuvers which cannot fully capture the integrated behavioral process during freeway diverging. A multivariate pattern perspective is therefore needed to better understand driver behavior in these areas. Using naturalistic driving data collected in Shanghai, this study investigates short-term driving patterns and their influencing factors in freeway diverging areas, alongside the microscopic interactive environments and longitudinal safety disparities among various driving patterns. A Hierarchical Dirichlet Process Hidden Semi-Markov Model (HDP-HSMM) is used to segment multivariate driving sequences, and the resulting segments are classified into driving patterns using a PCA-based K-means clustering approach. Machine-learning models combined with SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) are then applied to quantify the effects of driver characteristics and environmental factors on the duration ratios of different driving patterns. Three driving patterns are identified: high-speed deceleration (Pattern #0), visual-checking slight lane change (Pattern #1), and low-speed deceleration lane change (Pattern #2). Their spatial evolution shows a consistent trend: Pattern #0 dominates near the entrance of the diverging area and Pattern #2 becomes dominant near the taper section. Driving styles, traffic density, weather conditions, and the number of taper lanes have the strongest effects on pattern durations. Pattern #0 and Pattern #2 prevail in free-flow and car-following conditions respectively, and Pattern #1 shows the highest longitudinal conflict risk, whereas the 3.25-km scenario shows the lowest.
Related Concept Videos
Variability: Analysis
The range is a simple measure of variability, indicating the difference between the highest and...
Social Traps
Manipulation and Analysis
Multi-input and Multi-variable systems
In the absence of...
Design Example: Analyzing Capacity Contours for Flood Risk Assessment
Decision Making: Traditional Method
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is decided based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to this claim is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses, out of which a null hypothesis would be a...

