Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 5, 2026

High-throughput, Microscale Protocol for the Analysis of Processing Parameters and Nutritional Qualities in Maize (Zea mays L.)
Published on: June 16, 2018
Copra meal in animal nutrition: nutritional constraints, processing strategies, and species-specific utilization
Lun Sun1, Nittaya Taethaisong1, Weerada Meethip1
1Institute of Agricultural Technology, Suranaree University of Technology, Nakhon Ratchasima, Thailand.
Abstract:
Copra meal (CM), a co-product of coconut oil extraction, is a regionally important feed ingredient whose value cannot be judged from crude protein concentration alone. Its nutritional value is affected by drying and oil-extraction conditions, residual lipid content, mannan-rich cell-wall carbohydrates, and the digestive capacity of the target species. This review evaluates CM in poultry, swine, and ruminant diets, with emphasis on nutritional constraints, processing strategies, and species-specific utilization. Copra meal generally provides moderate crude protein, a low lysine-to-crude protein ratio, variable residual oil, and a carbohydrate fraction dominated by β-mannans, including galactomannans. In monogastric animals, these characteristics may restrict nutrient utilization through physical encapsulation of nutrients, limited endogenous hydrolysis of β-mannans, increased digesta viscosity under some dietary conditions, and possible immune recognition of intact mannan structures. Ruminants are usually more tolerant of CM because rumen microorganisms can ferment fibrous substrates and convert part of dietary nitrogen into microbial protein. Nevertheless, residual lipid rich in lauric acid may alter rumen fermentation and methane formation, whereas excessive CM inclusion may reduce intake, fiber digestion, or nitrogen utilization. Processing strategies, including β-mannanase supplementation, pre-feed enzymatic hydrolysis, and solid-state fermentation, may improve nutrient availability and generate potentially functional oligosaccharides, but their effectiveness depends on CM composition and processing conditions and should be verified through digestible nutrient supply or animal performance. Current evidence supports the species-specific use of well-characterized CM products rather than broad replacement of soybean meal or cereal ingredients with CM. Future research should establish processing-based quality standards and clarify digestible amino acid supply, ruminant protein value, and the functional effects of CM-derived products in well-characterized animal trials.
Related Concept Videos
Optimal Foraging
Key Elements for Plant Nutrition
Energy Budgets and Reproductive Strategies
Protein Digestion

