Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 5, 2026

The Use of an Automated System (GreenFeed) to Monitor Enteric Methane and Carbon Dioxide Emissions from Ruminant Animals
Published on: September 7, 2015
Forage characteristics as drivers of variation in enteric methane emission in cattle and sheep: a meta-analysis
S van Gastelen1, A Bannink1, C Benchaar2
1Wageningen Livestock Research, Wageningen University & Research, PO Box 338, 6700 AH Wageningen, the Netherlands.
Abstract:
A meta-analysis was performed to determine whether improved forage quality is equally effective at reducing CH4 yield from cattle and sheep. Accordingly, ruminants were categorised into three classes: lactating dairy cattle, other cattle (i.e., beef cattle and non-lactating dairy cattle), and sheep. Data from 24 studies (109 treatment means) met the selection criteria for inclusion in the meta-analysis. The relationship between CH4 yield (g/kg DM intake (DMI) and g/kg digestible OM intake (DOMI); CH4/DMI and CH4/DOMI, respectively) and forage quality characteristics (apparent total tract organic matter digestibility (%; ATTDOM), NDF content (g/kg DM), and CP content (g/kg DM)) was determined using a mixed model univariate regression procedure. The relationship between forage quality characteristics and CH4 emissions depended on the metric of CH4 emission, being consistently stronger (i.e., higher R2) for CH4/DOMI compared to CH4/DMI for the three ruminant classes. For CH4/DMI, substantial differences were observed due to differences in extent of ruminal fermentation and associated processes as well as differences in feed intake level (kg/d and g/kg metabolic BW). For lactating dairy cattle, CH4/DMI was related to ATTDOM (R2 = 0.35, slope = -0.146), NDF content (R2 = 0.68, slope = 0.014), and CP content (R2 = 0.65, slope = -0.021). For other cattle, CH4/DMI was only related to CP content (R2 = 0.18, slope = -0.008), and for sheep, tendencies for relationships in opposite directions than expected were detected between CH4/DMI and both ATTDOM (R2 = 0.39, slope = 0.064) and NDF content (R2 = 0.46, slope = -0.007). For CH4/DOMI, the relationships with forage quality characteristics were statistically significant for the three ruminant classes, and always in the expected directions, likely due to comparable (i) shifts in ruminal fermentation and consequently H2 availability, (ii) increased microbial efficiency and consequently less volatile fatty acids per unit of organic matter (OM) fermented, and (iii) methanogen activity between cattle and sheep. It is concluded that the effectiveness of reducing enteric CH4 emissions by improved forage quality differs between the three ruminant classes for CH4/DMI, being effective in lactating dairy cattle, effective to a lesser extent in other cattle, and not effective or increasing CH4/DMI in sheep, likely driven by differences in extent of fermentation and feeding level between these ruminants. For CH4/DOMI, improved forage quality effectively reduced enteric CH4 across dairy cattle, other cattle, and sheep, with ATTDOM and CP content negatively related and NDF content positively related to CH4/DOMI.
Related Concept Videos
Microbes and Methanogenesis
Overview of Metabolism
Plant Metabolism
Sunlight, the primary source of energy in plants, is first absorbed by the chlorophyll pigments present in their leaves. Plants then use this energy to carry out photosynthesis, where water is oxidized into oxygen and carbon dioxide...

