Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 5, 2026

Comprehensive & Cost Effective Laboratory Monitoring of HIV/AIDS: an African Role Model
Published on: October 31, 2010
Improving the Outlook for Infectious Disease Control in the United States Through State-Led Initiatives
Mary-Margaret A Fill1, William Schaffner2
1Tennessee Department of Health, Division of Communicable and Environmental Diseases and Emergency Preparedness.
Abstract:
Policy Points This is a pivotal time for state leaders and policymakers to lean into opportunities to enhance infectious disease control in the United States. There are extensive opportunities for state-led initiatives to be influential in the areas of public health infectious disease detection, public health funding, and public health infrastructure. It is imperative to remember that "all responses are local" and that the ultimate authority to detect, investigate, control, and prevent the spread of infectious diseases in the United States falls to states.
Context:
Over the last decade, the United States has encountered numerous infectious disease-related public health threats, observed declines in life expectancy and childhood vaccination rates, and experienced rapid changes and reorganizations to the domestic public health system. There is a window of opportunity for state leaders and policymakers to strengthen state, tribal, local, and territorial public health infrastructure amidst a changing federal landscape in order to ensure optimized infectious disease control in the United States.
Methods:
This perspective synthesizes evidence from the public health literature and draws on the collective experience of the authors working in the applied public health field. We offer considerations for state leaders and policymakers to ensure optimized infectious disease control in the United States though state-led initiatives and direction.
Findings:
Although many public health activities related to infectious disease detection, investigation, control, and prevention are funded and directed by federal public health authorities, state, tribal, local, and territorial health departments have held the legal authority for this work since the early 19th century. Recent changes and relative instability at the federal level are noteworthy; however, "all responses are local" and the ultimate authority to detect, investigate, control, and prevent the spread of infectious diseases in the United States falls to states.
Conclusions:
State leaders have a duty and responsibility to protect the health of their population and ensure a posture of readiness to effectively respond to infectious disease health threats. States can step forward and embrace innovation in this space to ensure optimized infectious disease control in the United States prior to the next emerging infectious disease public health threat.
Related Concept Videos
Investigation of Disease Outbreaks
Steps in Outbreak Investigation
Healthcare Associated Infections II: Preventive Measures
The best practices for preventing healthcare-associated infections include hand hygiene, patient risk...
Methods Of Healthcare Delivery System
Managed Care System:
The managed care system is designed to control the cost while maintaining the quality of care. The patient's care from admission to discharge is planned by the primary care provider or the case manager, also known as the gatekeeper. In a managed care system, the number of care providers is limited...
Principles of Disease Surveillance
Smallpox
