Prescribing patterns of vitamin and cofactor therapies in genetically confirmed primary mitochondrial diseases

Primary mitochondrial diseases (PMDs) comprise a genetically and clinically heterogeneous group of disorders for which evidence-based therapeutic options remain limited. Despite advances in molecular diagnosis and the identification of gene-specific therapeutic targets for selected conditions, vitamin and cofactor supplementation continues to be frequently prescribed. We aimed to evaluate prescribing patterns, dosing practices and the balance between PMDs with established genotype-directed metabolic therapy and PMDs managed with empirical supplementation in a genetically confirmed PMD cohort.

We retrospectively reviewed 62 patients with genetically confirmed PMDs followed at a tertiary pediatric metabolism center between 2015 and 2025. Demographic, genetic and treatment-related data were collected, including vitamin and cofactor use and dosing regimens. Patients were categorized as PMDs with genotype-directed therapies and PMDs managed with empirical supplementation.

Sixty-two patients were included (43.5% female; mean age 10.7 years). Oxidative phosphorylation (OXPHOS) complex defects were the most common genetic category (35.5%). Overall, 71% of patients received at least one vitamin or cofactor supplement. Coenzyme Q10 (62.9%), carnitine (53.2%), riboflavin (48.4%), biotin (37.1%) and thiamine (35.5%) were the most frequently prescribed agents. Thirteen patients (21%) had PMDs with established targeted therapies and received genotype-directed treatment. Among the remaining 49 patients, who lacked a defined genotype-directed therapeutic option and were therefore classified as being managed with empirical supplementation, 63.2% (31/49) received at least one vitamin or cofactor supplement.

Despite advances in molecular diagnosis, empirical vitamin and cofactor supplementation remains frequently used in patients with PMDs who lack established gene- or pathway-specific therapeutic options. These findings underscore the persistent gap between molecular diagnosis and evidence-based therapy and support the need for prospective multicenter studies to guide standardized treatment approaches in PMDs.