Related Experiment Videos
A Nutritional-Inflammatory Composite Score to Support Nursing Risk Stratification in Suspected Multidrug-Resistant
Ming Chang1, Zhou Wenjuan2, Xingzhen Yang3
1Department of Respiratory Medicine, Tai'an Cancer Hospital, No. 390 Lingshan Street, Tai'an City, Shandong Province, 271000, P.R. China; Department of Critical Care Medicine, Laizhou Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, No. 832 Wenhua East Street, Laizhou City, 261400, P.R. China.
Background:
Nontuberculous mycobacterial pulmonary disease (NTM-PD) and multidrug-resistant pulmonary tuberculosis (MDR-PTB) share overlapping clinical and radiological features, leading to frequent misdiagnosis and inappropriate treatment. Simple, low-cost risk stratification tools are needed, particularly for nursing staff in resource-limited settings. This study developed and evaluated a Nutritional-Inflammatory Composite Score (NICS) for differentiating NTM-PD from MDR-PTB.
Methods:
We retrospectively enrolled 500 patients with suspected MDR-PTB who underwent confirmatory microbiological testing. Final diagnoses were MDR-PTB (n=338, 67.6%) and NTM-PD (n=162, 32.4%). Three logistic regression models were compared: clinical (age, BMI, smoking, diabetes, COPD, bronchiectasis), laboratory (CRP, albumin, ferritin, lymphocytes), and NICS-based (age, BMI, diabetes, COPD, bronchiectasis, and NICS). Model discrimination was assessed by area under the ROC curve (AUC).
Results:
NICS was the strongest independent predictor of NTMPD (OR=1.14 per unit increase, 95% CI: 1.08-1.20, p<0.001). The NICS-based model achieved the highest AUC (0.66, 95% CI: 0.61-0.71), compared with the clinical model (AUC=0.57, 95% CI: 0.52-0.62) and the laboratory model (AUC=0.60, 95% CI: 0.54-0.65). Using the Youden derived optimal cutoff, sensitivity was 35.19%, specificity 73.96%, PPV 39.31%, and NPV 70.42% (overall correct classification 61.40%).
Conclusion:
NICS improves NTMPD versus MDRPTB discrimination modestly but significantly (ΔAUC = 0.09 vs. clinical model). The nomogram represents a preliminary research instrument for risk estimation; however, the low sensitivity at the optimal threshold precludes its use as a diagnostic tool, limiting its role to hypothesis generation pending prospective validation. Prospective usability testing and external validation remain necessary.
Related Concept Videos
Pulmonary Tuberculosis IV
Several diagnostic approaches are used to detect TB. The conventional method is the Tuberculin Skin Test (TST), also known as the Mantoux test. However, this method has...
Pulmonary Tuberculosis V
Latent tuberculosis infection occurs when TB bacteria are present in a person's body, but are not causing illness or symptoms. It is not contagious, and preventive treatment is crucial to avoid the progression...
Pulmonary Tuberculosis III
The first classification is based on the development of the disease, and it includes the following categories:
Pulmonary Tuberculosis I
Causative Organism
The primary infectious agent causing tuberculosis is Mycobacterium tuberculosis, a slow-growing, acid-fast, aerobic rod that exhibits sensitivity to heat and ultraviolet light. Instances of Mycobacterium bovis and Mycobacterium avium contributing to the development of TB infection are rare.
Mode of...