Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 7, 2026

High Content Screening Analysis to Evaluate the Toxicological Effects of Harmful and Potentially Harmful Constituents (HPHC)
Published on: May 10, 2016
Agreement and classification performance of the heaviness of smoking index (HSI) compared with the Fagerström test
Abdurrahman Charkazi1, Seyed Ghadir Hosseini2, Hajar Dehghan3
1Associate Professor of Health Education & Promotion, Environmental Health Research Center, Faculty of Health, Golestan University of Medical Sciences, Gorgan, Iran.
Background:
The Heaviness of Smoking Index (HSI) is a brief tool for assessing nicotine addiction. This study evaluated the agreement and classification performance of the HSI relative to the Fagerström Test for Cigarette Dependence (FTCD).
Methods:
In this cross-sectional study of 1147 adult smokers, HSI scores were derived from the FTCD. Agreement and apparent classification performance were examined using Pearson correlation, intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), Cohen's kappa, receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis, and Bland-Altman plots across demographic and behavioral subgroups.
Results:
HSI showed a strong correlation with FTCD (r = 0.904) and excellent continuous agreement (ICC = 0.95). Categorical agreement for high nicotine addiction was substantial (κ ≈ 0.65). ROC analysis demonstrated excellent apparent classification performance (AUC = 0.942) for identifying FTCD-defined severe addiction. An HSI cut-off of ≥3 (derived from an optimal threshold of 2.5) provided a favorable balance between sensitivity and specificity for initial screening, whereas a cut-off of ≥4 showed high specificity for severe addiction. Performance remained generally consistent across subgroups, although some subgroup-specific variation was observed. Bland-Altman analysis indicated minimal mean bias, although HSI proportionally underestimated addiction at higher severity levels.
Conclusion:
HSI demonstrates strong agreement with FTCD and may serve as a rapid screening measure for assessing nicotine addiction. A lower cut-off (≥3) may be useful for initial screening, whereas a higher cut-off (≥4) may help identify severe addiction. Caution is warranted at higher addiction levels and among poly-tobacco users.
Related Concept Videos
Hypothesis Test for Test of Independence
H0: The two variables (factors)...
Test for Homogeneity
