Related Experiment Videos
Limitations of evaluating risks of all cancers combined in etiological epidemiology research
Julie E Goodman1, Satori A Marchitti1, Nicole S Olgun2
1Gradient, Boston, MA, United States of America.
Abstract:
The International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) was the first public health agency to conclude that an agent - in this case, 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin (TCDD) - could be carcinogenic based on associations with all cancers combined, even though there were no consistent associations with any particular cancer type. Most types of cancer each represent an etiologically distinct disease. Epidemiology associations with all cancers combined may be false-positive findings, which lack biological meaning and do not adequately consider confounders, or could mask true associations with specific and/or rare cancer types. We propose that, if investigators report results of etiological analyses with all cancers or groups of etiologically distinct cancers (or other diseases), they consider the heterogenous nature of cancer and that their observations are hypothesis-generating statistical associations without an immediate mechanistic inference.
Related Concept Videos
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast, controlled...
Causality in Epidemiology
Criteria for Causality: Bradford Hill Criteria - II
Statistical Methods for Analyzing Epidemiological Data
Confounding in Epidemiological Studies
Cancer Prevention
Some...