Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 7, 2026

Non-Invasive PET/MR Imaging in an Orthotopic Mouse Model of Hepatocellular Carcinoma
Published on: August 31, 2022
Procedure-related uptake on CXCR4 PET/CT: a frequent pitfall independent of time and anatomical site
Sebastian E Serfling1, Yingjun Zhi2, Takahiro Higuchi1
1Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany.
Introduction:
As a pan-tumor tracer, chemokine receptor 4 (CXCR4)-directed [68Ga]Ga-PentixaFor is frequently utilized in patients with hematological malignancies. We aimed to evaluate the impact of recent surgical and interventional procedures on uptake.
Methods:
Patients undergoing [68Ga]Ga-PentixaFor PET/CT after prior surgical or interventional procedures were analyzed. Uptake at the procedural site was assessed visually and quantitatively (by applying maximum standardized uptake values [SUVmax], target-to-background ratios [TBR]). Quantitative parameters were compared across anatomical region groups (bone, organ, (sub-)cutaneous, muscle). We stratified patients demonstrating uptake in procedural sites into an early (0-30 days) and late group (≥ 31 days between intervention and [68Ga]Ga-PentixaFor PET). In patients with available [18F]FDG PET/CT, quantitative correlation analyses between both radiotracers were also performed.
Results:
Among 425 [68Ga]Ga-PentixaFor PET/CT examinations, 87 prior invasive procedures (20.5%) were identified. In 53 patients allocated to the early group, 29 subjects demonstrated uptake (54.7%), while in the late group, 22 out of 34 subjects revealed tracer accumulation at procedural sites (64.7%). Across the predefined temporal intervals, uptake rates varied numerically but did not differ significantly overall (p = 0.071). [68Ga]Ga-PentixaFor SUVmax (ρ = -0.03, p = 0.807) and TBR (ρ = 0.02, p = 0.876) showed no significant association between time since procedure. On a compartment level, SUVmax (p = 0.482) and TBR (p = 0.696) revealed no significant differences across investigated anatomical regions. In cases with available [18F]FDG PET (21/51 [41.2%]), quantitative uptake in procedural sites correlated significantly between both radiotracers (SUVmax: ρ = 0.55, p = 0.016; TBR: ρ = 0.68, p = 0.001), indicating that different inflammatory signatures at procedural sites may be captured by both radiotracers.
Conclusions:
Post-procedural CXCR4 uptake occurs frequently, with no statistically significant overall association with time since intervention or involved anatomical compartment.
More Related Videos
11:34Murine Lymphocyte Labeling by 64Cu-Antibody Receptor Targeting for In Vivo Cell Trafficking by PET/CT
Published on: April 29, 2017
09:21Human Brown Adipose Tissue Depots Automatically Segmented by Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography and Registered Magnetic Resonance Images
Published on: February 18, 2015