Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 7, 2026

Incorporating Target Protein Structure Flexibility and Dynamics in Computational Drug Discovery Using Ensemble-Based Docking Analysis
Published on: June 20, 2025
SilicoXplore: An integrated cloud platform coupling machine learning with physics-based modelling for end-to-end drug
Parth Mangal1, Omkar Shinde1, Sonali Chikhale1
1SilicoScientia Private Limited, Nagananda Commercial Complex, No. 07/3, 15/1, 18th Main Road, Jayanagar 9th Block, Bengaluru, 560 041, India; SilicoScientia Private Limited, Centre for Cellular and Molecular Platforms (C-CAMP), GKVK Campus, Bellary Road, Bengaluru, 560 065, India.
Abstract:
Modern drug discovery joins machine learning with physics-based simulation, but building such a pipeline needs Linux administration, dependency management, format conversion and scripting, which keeps out many of the chemists and biologists who ask the questions. We describe SilicoXplore, a cloud-hosted platform of 31 interoperable modules covering structure preparation, five docking engines, de novo generation, machine-learning prediction, ADMET estimation, molecular dynamics, free energy calculation and density functional theory, all driven through guided forms. Third-party engines are wrapped under their own licences rather than rewritten. It was applied to New Delhi metallo-β-lactamase-1, generating 752,436 molecules from 455 seed actives and narrowing them to four. Docking was validated by redocking, at 0.840 Å, and by enrichment against 4247 property-matched decoys, at an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.714. The four molecules and the reference were re-docked with both catalytic Zn2+ ions retained, then carried into triplicate 100 ns molecular dynamics with MM-GBSA and MM-PBSA analysis. Redocking reproduced both the crystallographic pose of the reference and its metal contact, at 2.215 Å, and three of the four molecules contacted a zinc ion directly. Replicate spread in the end-point energies matched the differences between molecules, so no ranking is claimed. The classifier, which reached an area under the curve of 0.985 within its training chemotype space, retained 76.5% of the library, because enforcing novelty places it outside the region in which the model was assessed. Selection was carried by the physics-based stages. All results are computational and require experimental validation.
Related Concept Videos
Drug Discovery: Overview
Ligand Binding Sites
Protein-ligand interactions are quite specific; even though numerous potential ligands surround a cellular protein at any given time, only a particular ligand can bind to that protein. Moreover, a ligand binds only to a dedicated area on the surface of the protein, known as the...
Protein-protein Interfaces