Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 7, 2026

Antimicrobial Synergy Testing by the Inkjet Printer-assisted Automated Checkerboard Array and the Manual Time-kill Method
Published on: April 18, 2019
Appropriate therapy and survival in carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales bacteraemia: A multicentre cohort study on
Yae Jee Baek1, Se Yoon Park2, Jung Ho Kim3
1Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Internal Medicine, Soonchunhyang University Seoul Hospital, Soonchunhyang University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Background:
Carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales (CRE) bloodstream infections are associated with high mortality and limited treatment options. This study aimed to characterize CRE epidemiology, identify risk factors for 30-d mortality, and evaluate the impact of appropriate combination therapy on mortality in patients with CRE bacteraemia using treatment regimens prior to the adoption of novel β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitors.
Methods:
This multicentre retrospective cohort study was conducted across 13 teaching hospitals in Korea. All notified CRE-positive cases (n = 8687) were analysed descriptively, while all clinical outcome analyses were confined to patients with monomicrobial CRE bacteraemia (n = 358). Antibiotic appropriateness was independently evaluated by infectious disease specialists, and inverse probability of treatment weighting was applied to adjust for confounding between treatment groups.
Results:
Blood-positive specimens accounted for 12.4% of all CRE-positive cases, a proportion that has increased over time. Among the bacteraemia cohort, the 30-d mortality was 34.1%. Independent predictors of 30-d mortality included higher quick Sequential Organ Failure Assessment score (odds ratio [OR] = 1.57; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.22-2.01; P < 0.001) and septic shock (OR = 5.17; 95% CI 3.03-8.81; P < 0.001). Combination therapy showed no overall survival advantage after inverse probability of treatment weighting adjustment. However, a significant mortality benefit was observed with definitive colistin-based combination therapy (adjusted OR = 0.42; 95% CI 0.18-0.98; P = 0.044) and in those with a high comorbidity burden (Charlson Comorbidity Index ≥6; adjusted OR = 0.34; 95% CI 0.12-0.98; P = 0.046), though not in KPC-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae subgroup. Among KPC-producing K. pneumoniae isolates, amikacin and colistin retained high in vitro activity.
Conclusions:
In CRE bacteraemia, combination therapy did not confer a uniform survival advantage, but was associated with lower mortality in patients receiving colistin-based regimens and those with high comorbidity burden. Sustained antimicrobial stewardship and continuous susceptibility surveillance of blood isolates remain essential for optimizing patient outcomes in settings where novel agents are limited.
Related Concept Videos
Clinical Significance of Antibiotic Resistance
Mechanism of Antibiotic Resistance in MRSA
Acute Pyelonephritis II: Diagnostic Studies and Management
Development of Antibiotic Resistance