Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 15, 2026

Implementation of a Real-Time Psychosis Risk Detection and Alerting System Based on Electronic Health Records using CogStack
Published on: May 15, 2020
Clinicians' ethical considerations regarding the use of prediction models in hand and wrist care: a qualitative study
Grada R Arends1, Yara E van Kooij1, Joene Rutten2
1Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, The Netherlands; Department of Plastic, Reconstructive, and Hand Surgery, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, The Netherlands; Xpert Handtherapie, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Objective:
To explore clinicians' ethical considerations regarding the use of prediction models in clinical decision-making in hand and wrist care.
Design:
We conducted semi-structured interviews and analysed them using hermeneutic-interpretive phenomenology. An example prediction model was used to predict whether a patient will achieve the improvement they aim for in a domain relevant to them, given their baseline score.
Setting:
Data were collected in the Netherlands from two specialized clinics for hand and wrist care and two academic hospitals.
Participants:
We purposefully selected seven hand surgeons and five hand therapists.
Interventions:
Not applicable MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Semi-structured interviews RESULTS: We identified four main themes. First, clinicians acknowledge the patient's voice in shared decision-making, but ultimately, they decide. Second, clinicians want to maintain their autonomy in treatment decisions because they have a strong clinical intuition and feel that a prediction model will never be as good as their clinical judgment. Third, deviating from predictions is sometimes needed due to equity issues, the right to receive care, and the principle of striving for the least invasive treatment. Fourth, clinicians require sufficient information to build confidence in using the prediction model effectively.
Conclusions:
Clinicians consider prediction models ethically acceptable when they support, rather than replace, clinical judgment. Their main concerns are preserving professional autonomy and responsibility, respecting patient needs, ensuring equitable access to care, and being able to deviate from predictions when necessary. As prediction models improve, increased accuracy and transparency may enhance trust but may not resolve broader ethical issues, including patient preferences, fairness, responsibility, and accountability. Addressing these concerns is an important step toward enabling prediction models to support meaningful patient involvement, which could contribute to shared decision-making and improve quality of life.

