Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 7, 2026

Machine Learning Algorithms for Early Detection of Bone Metastases in an Experimental Rat Model
Published on: August 16, 2020
A radiomics-based machine learning model for the preoperative differentiation of lung adenocarcinoma subtypes
Fengjuan Tian1, Jing Ding1, Zhenyu Cao2
1Department of Radiology, Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China.
Background:
The preoperative differentiation of lung adenocarcinoma subtypes is critical for implementing personalized treatment but is difficult to accomplish with conventional imaging. This study aimed to develop an interpretable multimodal model integrating clinical, peritumoral, radiomic, and deep learning features to improve diagnostic accuracy.
Methods:
A total of 3,038 patients from four hospitals were divided into training (n=1,822), test (n=608), and validation (n=608) sets. Two radiologists manually segmented two-dimensional tumor regions on computed tomography using ITK-SNAP software. After Pearson correlation analysis and least absolute shrinkage and selection operator regression, the radiomic score and deep learning score were generated. Clinical features were selected via univariate analysis, the Boruta algorithm, and recursive feature elimination (RFE). Individual logistic models were built and fused with the optimal combination selected via support vector machine-synthetic minority oversampling technique and extreme gradient boosting. Performance was evaluated in terms of the Obuchowski index, accuracy, F1-score, calibration, and decision curves, while interpretability was assessed via Shapley additive explanations (SHAP) and individual conditional expectation (ICE).
Results:
The fused model achieved Obuchowski indices of 0.85 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.84-0.87], 0.81 (95% CI: 0.78-0.83), and 0.79 (95% CI: 0.76-0.81) in the training, test, and validation sets, respectively outperforming the single-modality models. The F1-scores for the lepidic, acinar/papillary, and solid/micropapillary subtypes, respectively, were 0.77, 0.61, and 0.63 in the training set; 0.72, 0.57, and 0.59 in the test set; and 0.74, 0.54, and 0.52 in the validation set. Calibration and decision curve analysis confirmed the robustness and clinical utility of the model. SHAP analysis identified ResNet-101 feature as the best predictor, followed by peritumoral radiomic score, and lobulation. ICE plots revealed the linear and monotonic relationships between key features and predicted probabilities across subtypes.
Conclusions:
The radiomics model developed in this study facilitates the accurate and interpretable preoperative classification of lung adenocarcinoma subtypes. Fusion of clinical, peritumoral, and deep learning features enhances diagnostic performance and supports clinical decision-making.