Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 8, 2026

A Suction Blister Protocol to Study Human T-cell Recall Responses In Vivo
Published on: August 11, 2018
Patient SAtisfaction with the TYSabri SC Formulation - A Swiss multi-centriC, prospective non-intervenTIONal study:
Chiara Zecca1, Guilio Disanto2,3, Gianna Carla Riccitelli2,3
1Neurocenter of Southern Switzerland, EOC, Via Tesserete, 46, Lugano, CH, 6900, Switzerland Faculty of biomedical Sciences, Università della Svizzera Italiana, Lugano, Switzerland.
Background:
Natalizumab (NTZ) is a highly effective disease-modifying therapy for relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS), originally administered intravenously (IV). A subcutaneous formulation (SC_NTZ) became available in Switzerland in 2021, offering potential advantages.
Objective:
To investigate satisfaction and convenience of use of SC_NTZ in MS patients.
Design:
Swiss, prospective, multicenter study.
Methods:
Consecutive RRMS patients treated with either ⩽6 (starters) or > 6 (long-term users) SC_NTZ injections completed the Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire with Medication-II (TSQM-II, higher scores indicating greater satisfaction) and the Patient Satisfaction Questionnaire (PSQ) at baseline (Visit 1, V1). Starters were reassessed at the 9th SC_NTZ dose (Visit 2, V2). Non-parametric tests were applied to compare long-term users with starters at V1, and changes from V1 to V2 in starters.
Results:
One hundred six patients (73.6% female, median age 39.6 years, prior IV_NTZ 81.1%) were enrolled, including 79 long-term users and 27 starters. At V1, in the overall group the median (IQR) TSQM-II effectiveness, side effects, convenience and global satisfaction scores were 83 (67-100), 100 (92-100), 83 (72-89) and 83 (75-100), respectively. On the PSQ, the most commonly cited benefit was short administration time (80.2%). SC_NTZ treatment "never" affected work attendance in 54/87 (62.1%) employed patients. Seventy-nine percent participants reported spending ⩽1 h for SC_NTZ administration. Nonetheless, 76/86 (88.4%) of switchers from IV_NTZ found opportunities for discussions with healthcare professionals to be "similar"/"improved," and 78 (90.7%) preferred SC_NTZ. Findings were consistent across subgroups and time points.
Conclusion:
This real-world, multicenter Swiss study supports SC_NTZ as a well-tolerated, highly accepted, and patient-preferred alternative to IV_NTZ.
Related Concept Videos
Bioavailability Study Design: Healthy Subjects Versus Patients
Bioequivalence studies: Biowaivers
Bioavailability Study Design: Single Versus Multiple Dose Studies