Prediction of tannins as a phytogenic additive effect on in vitro enteric methane emissions in ruminants: A meta-analysis
Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 8, 2026

The Use of an Automated System (GreenFeed) to Monitor Enteric Methane and Carbon Dioxide Emissions from Ruminant Animals
Published on: September 7, 2015
Ana Karen Frutis-Moto1, Gregorio Álvarez-Fuentes2, Mendoza D German3
1Posgrado Multidisciplinario en Ciencias Ambientales, Universidad Autónoma de San Luis Potosí, San Luis Potosí 78210, México.
Abstract:
Objectives: This study aimed to quantify the effects of dietary tannins on in vitro methane emissions and to develop substrate-specific predictive equations for methane estimation in ruminants. Materials and Methods: A systematic review was conducted following PRISMA guidelines, including studies published between 2010 and 2024 in Scopus, Web of Science, PubMed, and ScienceDirect. A total of 32 studies (213 observations) met the inclusion criteria and were classified into foliage (n = 130) and forage (n = 83) datasets. Pearson correlations and stepwise regression models were developed using 75% of the data and validated with the remaining 25%. Results: Tannin concentrations showed high variability (0.40-391.00 gm/kg DM). In foliage, methane emissions were negatively correlated with condensed tannins (r = -0.40; p < 0.001), whereas in forages, total tannins showed a positive correlation (r = 0.27; p < 0.05). Predictive models demonstrated moderate accuracy, with higher performance in forage (R² = 54.61%; RMSEP = 0.13) compared to foliage (R² = 28.45%; RMSEP = 0.53). These contrasting responses highlight a strong substrate-dependent effect of tannins on methanogenesis. Conclusions: Methane mitigation is influenced not only by tannin concentration, particularly condensed tannins, but also by substrate type and chemical composition. This study provides a novel substrate-specific predictive framework integrating tannin fractions and bromatological variables, offering a practical tool for rapid screening of antimethanogenic feed resources. However, model accuracy could be improved by incorporating physiological and fermentation-related variables.

