Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 9, 2026

MRI-guided dmPFC-rTMS as a Treatment for Treatment-resistant Major Depressive Disorder
Published on: August 11, 2015
The Antidepressant Effects of the mGlu2/3 Receptor Antagonist TS-161 in Treatment-Resistant Depression: A Phase IIa
Mark D Kvarta1, Mai Watanabe2,3, Satoshi Ozaki2,3
1Experimental Therapeutics and Pathophysiology Branch, National Institute of Mental Health, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD.
Background:
Like ketamine, group II metabotropic glutamate receptor (mGluR2/3) antagonists increase glutamate release and monoaminergic signaling, promote synaptic plasticity, and show antidepressant-related activity in preclinical models. A recent phase I trial of the orthosteric mGluR2/3 antagonist prodrug TS-161 established its safety, tolerability, and pharmacokinetic profile.
Methods:
This phase IIa randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind, crossover, proof-of-concept, single-site trial was designed to evaluate the antidepressant effects of TS-161. Eleven unmedicated adults with treatment-resistant depression received either oral TS-161 (50 to 100 mg daily) or a placebo for 3 weeks before crossing over to the other condition. The study was halted early due to low recruitment.
Results:
Adverse events were mild and consistent with the prior phase I study. Linear mixed models using drug×time interaction to estimate mean Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale scores per treatment identified no significant difference between treatment conditions at any timepoint, including the primary endpoint, day 21 (P=0.91). One of the 11 participants responded to TS-161 by day 7 (vs. 0/9 receiving placebo); no participants achieved remission. Magnetic resonance spectroscopy suggested a qualitative trend for increased glutamate metabolite values, and TS-161 increased gamma power during magnetoencephalography relative to baseline and placebo (pFDR<0.01) in lateral cortical regions. Peripheral brain-derived neurotrophic factor levels trended toward elevation (overall drug effect P=0.055). No advantages were seen in secondary clinical or cognitive outcomes.
Conclusions:
The findings suggest potential central nervous system engagement through proxy biomarkers and increased glutamatergic tone, but this did not translate to clinical improvement.

