Cross-Platform Concordance in DNA Methylation Based Classification of CNS Tumors

DNA methylation profiling enables precise classification of pediatric central nervous system (CNS) tumors. Oxford Nanopore Technologies (ONT) offers same-day, single-sample methylation readouts, but its concordance with Illumina EPIC arrays in routine diagnostic tasks remains incompletely defined. We profiled 23 pediatric tumors (18 CNS, 5 non-CNS) by EPIC arrays and ONT. Methylation profiles from both platforms were classified with crossNN (brain model or pan-cancer model); ONT data were additionally classified with Rapid-CNS2 and Sturgeon. We compared (i) classifier agreement with integrated histology (w/o NGS) at family/class levels, (ii) pass-rate above platform-specific score cutoffs, (iii) cross-platform concordance of copy-number variation (CNV), and MGMT promoter methylation status. In CNS cases, ONT and EPIC methylation profiles demonstrated strong correlation, except for a single outlier (P2), which was excluded from further analysis. Comparative assessment of the two platforms showed that: (a) Molecular classification of CNS tumors using the crossNN classifier was consistent with histology (w/o NGS) at the family level in all cases. (b) Copy-number profiles showed high concordance between platforms. (c) MGMT promoter methylation status matched in 94% of cases (16/17). When comparing ONT-specific analysis pipelines using the ONT data, the Rapid-CNS2 pipeline yielded the most reliable class level assignments with 94% (16/17) concordance with the histopathological diagnosis, which marginally exceeded the crossNN and sturgeon classifiers. In non-CNS tumors, the pan-cancer model produced low-confidence outputs with poor agreement with histology (w/o NGS) (only 1/5 concordant), indicating limited readiness for these entities. In conclusion, ONT enables same-day, clinically reliable family-level CNS tumor classification with high concordance to arrays, while EPIC retains a modest class-level edge. A key limitation of ONT is its reliance on fresh-frozen DNA and on classifiers originally built around array-derived CpG sites, rather than on models developed natively from ONT data.