Handle with care: packaging the oocyte epigenome for the next generation

During oocyte growth, substantial epigenetic programming occurs to establish a distinctive epigenome including appropriately patterned DNA methylation and histone modifications. Oocyte epigenetic programming must be tightly spatiotemporally regulated to ensure that a wide variety of epigenetic modifiers correctly establish their respective modifications to mediate precise control of gene expression. Furthermore, epigenetic modifications in oocytes include canonical and non-canonical genomic imprints, which are transmitted through meiosis to offspring. Significantly, disruptions in oocyte epigenetic programming can cause aberrant developmental outcomes in the next generation mediated by altered imprinting. Polycomb repressive complex 2 is an important epigenetic modifier that establishes histone 3 lysine 27 trimethylation and non-canonical imprints during mouse oogenesis, which are important for normal offspring development. While it is widely recognised that altered oocyte epigenetic programming can disrupt offspring development, mechanisms controlling maternal epigenetic inheritance remain poorly understood. The possibility remains that non-canonical imprinting exists in humans, although this requires confirmation. This review discusses mouse and human oocyte epigenetic programming including interactions between various epigenetic modifiers and modifications that form the unique oocyte epigenome. Understanding how oocyte epigenetic programming is regulated will be crucial in discerning how changes to the oocyte epigenome can disrupt epigenetic memory and alter developmental outcomes in offspring.