Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 9, 2026

Structured Approach to Colonoscopy Technique Optimization: A Single-Center Experience with Novice Endoscopists
Published on: July 11, 2025
Evaluating adenoma detection and miss rates in tandem colonoscopy: Limitations of surrogate quality indicators
1Department of Internal Medicine, Ninth People's Hospital of Nanhai District, Foshan, China.
Background:
The adenoma detection rate (ADR) is a key quality metric in colonoscopy. However, it may not accurately reflect the true number of adenomas and requires pathological evaluation of all detected polyps. The adenoma miss rate (AMR), which quantifies adenomas missed during colonoscopy, may provide a more comprehensive measure of colonoscopy quality.
Objectives:
To evaluate the effectiveness of ADR and selected surrogate quality indicators (SQIs) in reflecting AMR.
Material And Methods:
In this prospective, cross-sectional, multicenter study, we analyzed asymptomatic individuals aged 50-72 years who underwent tandem colonoscopies using a split-dose bowel preparation regimen. Colonoscopies were performed by 7 endoscopists (experts with >10 years of experience from different institutions) over the last 5 years. Consecutive colonoscopies were performed by the same endoscopist under identical conditions. During the 2nd colonoscopy, polyps missed during the 1st colonoscopy were documented. All removed polyps were subsequently evaluated by a pathologist.
Results:
We analyzed colonoscopy data from 356 patients (182 (51.12%) males and 174 (48.88%) females), representing a total of 712 colonoscopies. Adenomas were confirmed in 221 participants (62%). The number of adenomas missed during the 1st colonoscopy was 88, whereas 60 participants had at least 1 missed adenoma. No statistically significant variation among endoscopists was observed in the polyp detection rate (range: 48.000-64.000%, p = 0.658) or the adenoma detection rate (range: 54.000-74.000%, p = 0.151). Adenomas per positive participant ranged from 1.05 to 1.89, and adenomas per colonoscopy ranged from 0.70 to 1.44 (p = 0.063). The overall pooled lesion-level AMR was 20.046%. None of the SQIs showed a significant association with AMR (p > 0.050 for all comparisons). Although SQIs and ADR varied among endoscopists, no statistically significant variation in AMR was observed among the 7 endoscopists (p > 0.050).
Conclusions:
A high ADR alone does not ensure a lower AMR in tandem colonoscopy for colorectal cancer screening. In this limited provider-level sample, no statistically significant association was observed between SQIs and AMR.
Related Concept Videos
Imaging Studies III: Gastrointestinal Motility Studies and Virtual Colonoscopy
Radionuclide Testing
Radionuclide testing is a sophisticated medical technique for assessing gastrointestinal motility. It focuses on gastric emptying and colonic transit time. Radioactive markers track the movement of food through the digestive system, providing insights into gastrointestinal disorders.
In gastric emptying studies, a meal's liquid and solid...
Assessment of the Rectum and Anus
Rectal Inspection
Begin by inspecting the perianal and anal areas for color, texture, rashes,...