Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 10, 2026

Murine Model of Leukemia Relapse to Induction Chemotherapy for Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia
Published on: October 17, 2025
Blinatumomab Care Delivery for Pediatric B-Cell Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia
Daniel J Zheng1,2, Katelyn Oranges2, Subhash Ramakrishnan3
1University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia.
Importance:
Blinatumomab, a novel immunotherapy administered as a 28-day continuous infusion, has fundamentally shifted the treatment paradigm for pediatric B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (B-ALL) and is now considered a component of standard therapy for the most common childhood cancer. However, the care delivery challenges in transitioning from an experimental agent on a clinical trial to widespread clinical implementation are unknown.
Objective:
To characterize the clinical landscape of pediatric blinatumomab care-delivery practice and challenges in the US from the perspective of treating centers.
Design, Setting, And Participants:
This survey study was conducted from February to March 2025 among US member institutions of the Children's Oncology Group (COG) across 44 states.
Exposure:
Institutional characteristics, including participation in the National Cancer Institute Community Oncology Research Program (NCORP), US census region, site-reported annual pediatric ALL patient volume, and prior blinatumomab experience, were assessed.
Main Outcomes And Measures:
Incorporation of blinatumomab as standard therapy by pediatric B-ALL subtype; major outpatient care-delivery challenges defined as 4 or 5 on a 5-point Likert scale by more than 25% of centers.
Results:
Of 195 active US COG member institutions, 147 centers completed the survey and were successfully matched with a unique COG identifier, among which 35 institutions (23.8%) were NCORP participants. There were 32 institutions (21.8%) in Midwest, 30 institutions (20.4%) in Northeast, 60 institutions (40.8%) in South, and 25 institutions (17.0%) in West census regions. Most centers reported using blinatumomab as their institutional standard therapy for National Cancer Institute standard risk-average (134 centers [91.2%]), standard risk-high (144 centers [98.0%]), and high-risk (140 centers [95.2%]) B-ALL. Fewer centers reported using blinatumomab for infant (83 centers [56.5%]) or Philadelphia chromosome-positive (96 centers [65.3%]) B-ALL. The most common major outpatient blinatumomab site care-delivery challenges included lack of home care companies (75 centers [51.0%]), family distance to treating center (41 centers [27.9%]), and insurance coverage for home care companies (37 centers [25.2%]). There were 67 sites (45.6%) that reported having no home care company options for any patients.
Conclusions And Relevance:
In this study, challenges associated with pediatric blinatumomab home care were highly prevalent, with broader implications for health system infrastructure availability. These data highlight a need to plan for clinical implementation strategies alongside the development and testing of novel therapies.
