Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 10, 2026

Generalized Psychophysiological Interaction (PPI) Analysis of Memory Related Connectivity in Individuals at Genetic Risk for Alzheimer's Disease
Published on: November 14, 2017
Sample size determination for a prospective bridging study to harmonize retrospective data from multiple
Chengjie Xiong1,2, Yuzheng Nie1,2, Jingqin Luo1,2,3,4
1Center for Biostatistics and Data Science, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, MO, USA.
Abstract:
Biomarkers measured from biofluid samples and imaging scans are important to aid diagnosis of diseases and track their progression over time, especially in neurodegenerative diseases such as Alzheimer's disease (AD). Combining retrospectively obtained biomarker data across multiple studies can increase statistical power, but existing biomarker data may be generated using different assay platforms, scanner types, or processing protocols by different studies, which may significantly affect the measurements of biomarkers and hence render it necessary to harmonize the data across the studies. An optimal way of biomarker data harmonization is to re-analyze all the biofluid samples or imaging scans together on a single platform in a central reference lab, but this is often not practical because of the substantial cost involved as well as the limited amount of biofluid samples available. A more practical solution is to prospectively design a bridging study by re-measuring a subset of biofluid samples or imaging scans from the studies in a reference lab to evaluate how biomarker values may be harmonized across studies. An important design question for such a bridging study is the size of the retrospectively collected biofluid samples or imaging scans that will be re-measured. We aim to address this question by conceptualizing a latent but true biomarker that underlies the observed versions of the biomarker measured across retrospective studies and proposing methods to determine the sample size of a bridging study for estimating the biological correlation of the true biomarker with a standard and validated clinical outcome. We also report bridging data of several analytes from cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) in a multi-center biomarker study of AD and demonstrate that a small proportion of the CSF samples may be sufficient to design a future bridging study for estimating the correlations of CSF biomarkers with a cognitive and functional outcome.
Related Concept Videos
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast, controlled...
Observational Studies
There are three types of observational studies – Prospective, retrospective, and cross-sectional.
Prospective Study
Prospective studies, also known as longitudinal or cohort studies, are carried out by collecting future data from groups sharing similar characteristics. One example of...
