The asymmetry of working memory training transfer: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Working memory (WM) training is widely used to enhance cognitive performance; however, its transfer to untrained tasks remains controversial. Traditional theories emphasize task similarity as the primary determinant of training transfer, but they cannot fully explain emerging evidence of asymmetric transfer across tasks. Two directional transfer hypotheses are proposed here to explain this asymmetry: the resource-based transfer advantage hypothesis predicts stronger transfer from more to less cognitively demanding tasks, whereas the ability-based transfer advantage hypothesis predicts stronger transfer from tasks engaging broader task-general abilities to tasks engaging task-specific narrower abilities. The contrast between span and updating paradigms provides an informative framework for distinguishing these accounts, because updating tasks are generally more cognitively demanding, whereas span tasks involve broader abilities. Accordingly, we conducted a three-level meta-analysis of 55 studies (208 effect sizes; N = 3,492). The results showed that updating training transferred reliably to span tasks (g = 0.176, p < .001), whereas span training did not reliably transfer to updating tasks (g = 0.048, p = .453), supporting the resource-based account. This advantage of updating training also extended to non-WM outcomes and was more pronounced at lower training doses, in non-adult samples, and with verbal stimuli. Together, these findings extend WM transfer theory beyond task similarity by highlighting the importance of cognitive demand and offer guidance for WM training design.