Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 11, 2026

Practical Methodology of Cognitive Tasks Within a Navigational Assessment
Published on: June 1, 2015
Towards distinctions-based Indigenous health workforce reform in Canada: A comparative policy analysis
Mona Lisa Bourque Bearskin1, Liquaa Wazni2, Nikki Rose Hunter-Porter St'uxwtsews3
1School of Nursing, BC Chair Indigenous Health Nursing, Faculty of Health, University of Victoria, Canada.
Background:
Indigenous health workforce reform in Canada remains shaped by colonial jurisdictional fragmentation, Indigenous-specific racism, and underinvestment. Although cultural safety initiatives and recruitment supports have expanded, reforms remain uneven and poorly coordinated.
Objective:
To compare recent Indigenous health workforce policy instruments in Canada and identify persistent gaps and policy directions for distinctions-based, culturally rooted reform.
Methods:
We conducted a structured narrative policy review of publicly available legislation, strategies, and professional/regulatory standards. Three cases were selected for their emphasis on Indigenous governance and cultural safety: British Columbia's Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples Act (DRIPA) Action Plan (2022-2027), Québec's Bill 32 establishing a cultural safety approach (2024), and Nunavut's Inuit Employment Plan (2024-2034). Analysis was organized across five dimensions of Indigenous governance and self-determination; cultural safety and anti-racism expectations; recruitment, retention, and mentorship; sustainable financing; and education/regulatory redesign.
Results:
Across cases, workforce-related instruments show emerging policy attention to Indigenous authority and cultural safety expectations, including co-development requirements and system-wide standards. However, implementation and accountability mechanisms remain inconsistent, financing is commonly short-term and fragmented, and accountability for measurable workforce equity varies across jurisdictions. These gaps constrain recruitment, retention, and leadership progression and limit sustained workforce infrastructure. Comparative insights from Aotearoa New Zealand, Australia, and the United States highlight the value of national coordination, measurable targets, and sustained investment.
Conclusion:
Canada would benefit from an Indigenous-led, distinctions-based workforce framework with measurable targets, transparent accountability, and renewable Indigenous-governed financing aligned with cultural safety and anti-racism requirements.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
International Nursing Organizations I
ICN member organizations work to advance the field of nursing and healthcare via policies, partnerships, lobbying, professional...
Introduction To Health Care Delivery System
The Institute of Medicine (IOM) advocates for a patient-centered, effective, safe, timely, equitable, and effective healthcare system. The National Priorities...
Methods Of Healthcare Delivery System
Managed Care System:
The managed care system is designed to control the cost while maintaining the quality of care. The patient's care from admission to discharge is planned by the primary care provider or the case manager, also known as the gatekeeper. In a managed care system, the number of care providers is limited...
Primary Healthcare Services
In 1978, international leaders convened in Alma-Ata, Kazakhstan, for what would be a pivotal event in global health. The Alma-Ata Declaration was the first to call...
Issues And Trends In Healthcare Delivery System
Cost Containment
Payment for healthcare services has historically promoted adoption of costly and often unnecessary or inefficient...
Documentation in Long-Term and Home Healthcare Setting
Long-Term Care Facilities

