Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 11, 2026

Contrast-Enhanced Subharmonic Aided Pressure Estimation (SHAPE) Using Ultrasound Imaging with a Focus on Identifying Portal Hypertension
Published on: December 5, 2020
Spleen and liver two-dimensional shear wave elastography for clinically significant portal hypertension
Christian Sebesta1, Mathias Jachs1, Lukas Hartl1
1Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Medicine III, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Vienna Hepatic Hemodynamic Lab, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Medicine III, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; LBG clinical research group MOTION, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Background & Aims:
Liver (LSM) and spleen (SSM) stiffness measurements correlate with hepatic venous pressure gradient (HVPG), the reference standard for defining clinically significant portal hypertension (CSPH, i.e. HVPG ≥10 mmHg). LSM, SSM and derived scores have been proposed for non-invasive CSPH risk assessment.
Methods:
Compensated advanced chronic liver disease (cACLD) patients undergoing same-day HVPG, Supersonic (SSI)-LSM, and SSI-SSM were prospectively included. Reliable SSI-LSM and SSI-SSM were defined by IQR/Med ≤30%. SSI-LSM, SSI-SSM and derived Baveno VII rules, Anticipate-SSI, LPS-SSI, and the newly developed SSI-4PH (LSM/SSM, platelet count: PLT, BMI) model were evaluated in a derivation cohort (DeCo) and an external validation cohort (VaCo).
Results:
The DeCo comprised 220 patients, paired reliable SSI-LSM/SSI-SSM measurements were available in 118 (53.6%) patients including 74.6% with CSPH. The VaCo comprised 86 eligible patients, of whom 73 (84.9%) had paired reliable measurements including 43.8% with CSPH. In reliable paired analyses, AUROCs for CSPH detection in the DeCo were 0.84 for Anticipate-SSI, 0.87 for LPS-SSI, and 0.90 for SSI-4PH; the corresponding AUROCs in the VaCo were 0.78, 0.77, and 0.73. At the fixed ≥75% predicted-risk threshold, specificity of SSI-4PH was 83.3% in the DeCo and 87.8% in the VaCo.
Conclusions:
Reliable SSI-LSM and SSI-SSM provide robust non-invasive assessment of CSPH risk, however, the requirement of reliable (IQR/Med ≤30%) paired measurements may limit applicability. Combined SSI-LSM/SSM-based rules and multivariable models reduced gray-zone, and the SSI-4PH yielded a favorable decision-curve utility for CSPH risk assessment.
Related Concept Videos
Ultrasound II: Endoscopic Ultrasound and FibroScan
Endoscopic Ultrasound (EUS):
Portal Hypertension
Esophageal Varices-II: Clinical Features and Management
In the initial assessment, a thorough review of the patient's medical history is vital to identify risk factors such as liver disease, alcohol abuse, or...
Hepatic Portal System
At its core, the hepatic portal vein is the result of a confluence of the superior and inferior mesenteric veins along with the splenic vein. Each of these veins has a unique role. The superior mesenteric vein is responsible...
Assessment of the Abdomen II: Percussion
Percussion
Percussion is an essential...
Esophageal Varices-I: Introduction

