Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 12, 2026
Monitoring Lung Function with Electrical Impedance Tomography in the Intensive Care Unit
Published on: September 6, 2024
Monitoring of breathing effort through pressure time product measurement using airway occlusion pressure (PTPPOCC
Emiliano Gogniat1,2,3, Emilio Steinberg4,5,6, Gustavo A Plotnikow7,4,8
1Servicio de Rehabilitación, Unidad de Terapia Intensiva, Hospital Británico de Buenos Aires, Ciudad Autónoma de Buenos Aires, Argentina. emilianogogniat@gmail.com.
Background:
Monitoring respiratory effort is crucial to prevent ventilator-induced lung injury and diaphragmatic dysfunction, but esophageal manometry (the gold standard) is invasive an can be cumbersome. The airway occlusion pressure (ΔPOCC) correlates with inspiratory effort but does not account for inspiratory time (Ti) or respiratory rate (RR). We aimed to validate a novel non-invasive index (PTPPOCC) that combines ΔPOCC, Ti, and RR to estimate the esophageal pressure-time product (PTPESO).
Methods:
We conducted a prospective, multicenter, physiological, crossover study. Three levels of inspiratory pressure (5, 10, and 15 cm H₂O) were randomly applied in patients with invasive mechanical ventilation in pressure support mode. We simultaneously measured PTPESO and calculated the non-invasive PTPPOCC (PTPPOCC-min = (0.75 × ΔPOCC × Ti / 2) × RR). Association was assessed using linear mixed-effects models. Diagnostic accuracy for detecting high (PTPESO >150 cmH₂O·s·min⁻¹) and low (PTPESO <50 cmH₂O·s·min⁻¹) inspiratory effort was evaluated using ROC curves.
Results:
A total of 49 patients were analyzed. A significant positive association was found between PTPESO-min and PTPPOCC-min (regression coefficient: 0.98; 95% CI: 0.86-1.1 p-value < 0.001). The mixed-effects model demonstrated good overall predictive performance (conditional R² = 0.80), although substantial inter-individual variability was observed (marginal R² = 0.40). The AUC for detecting high or low inspiratory effort was 0.91 (95% CI: 0.87-0.94), and 0.91 (95% CI: 0.88-0.94) respectively. Agreement analysis revealed proportional bias with wide limits of agreement.
Conclusions:
The PTPPOCC index showed good performance for identifying extremes of respiratory effort in mechanically ventilated patients. Despite limited individual agreement, its strong association and high specificity may make it a useful tool for confirming very low or excessively high inspiratory effort and for identifying patients at risk of over or under assistance.
Trial Registration:
The study was registered on ClinicalTrials.gov under the identifier NCT06040138 ( https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT06040138 ), first submitted date 2023-09-05.
Related Concept Videos
01:23Mechanical Ventilation III: Noninvasive Ventilation
Noninvasive Positive-Pressure Ventilation (NIPPV)
01:25Pulmonary Function Tests
Pulmonary Function Tests are crucial diagnostic tools for assessing respiratory function, particularly in patients with chronic respiratory disorders. They comprehensively evaluate lung volumes, ventilatory function, breathing mechanics, diffusion, and gas exchange. These tests help diagnose pulmonary diseases and play a significant role in monitoring disease progression, evaluating disability, and assessing response to therapy.
PFTs involve using a spirometer, a...
01:17Measurement of Blood Pressure
01:24Pressure Relationships in Thoracic Cavity
Breathing Mechanisms
Both intra-alveolar and intrapleural pressures rely on specific lung properties. The ability to breathe—allowing air to enter the lungs during...
01:22Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation II: ACLS Airway Management
01:23Assessment of Respiration
Subjective Assessment: Nurses interview the patient to gather information directly during the subjective assessment. It includes questions about the individual's medical history, medications, and symptoms, focusing on past respiratory conditions like asthma or COPD,...