Affected Psychological Safety, Micromanagement, and the Risks of Full Time Return to Office Policies
Iouliana Pillai1, Kateryna Metersky2
1Perioperative Servies, Surgery, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Abstract:
The objective of this article is to discuss organizational mandates for full return-to-office work. Concerns are emerging about the unintended impact on employee psychological safety, trust in employees' quality of work, well-being, and financial burden. This article outlines differences in hybrid work opportunities available to corporate and administrative staff with the limited flexibility of patient-facing healthcare professionals. It argues that rigid return-to-office mandates, particularly when combined with increased managerial oversight, can undermine autonomy, morale, engagement, and psychological safety. Drawing on Canadian workforce data, healthcare setting, and organizational behaviour research, this article demonstrates how flexible hybrid work arrangements support employee well-being, retention, and performance. It concludes that one-size-fits-all return-to-office policies may increase turnover, operational disruption, and organizational costs. The literature suggests that leadership approaches can aid in psychologically safe workplaces.
Related Concept Videos
Halo Effect
Psychological and Sociocultural Causes of Schizophrenia
Psychological Responses to Stress
Obedience
Psychosurgery
Historical Development of Psychosurgery
In the 1930s, Portuguese neurologist Antonio Egas Moniz introduced a surgical procedure designed...
Self-Presentation: Self-Monitoring and Self-Handicapping
