Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 13, 2026

Ex Vivo Porcine Experimental Model for Studying and Teaching Lung Mechanics
Published on: April 19, 2024
Flow-controlled ventilation: A systematic review of preclinical and clinical studies
Franziska Wagner1, Timur Yurttas2, Simon Becker3
1Department of Anaesthesiology, Rescue- and Pain Medicine Cantonal Hospital St. Gallen, HOCH Health Ostschweiz, St. Gallen, Switzerland.
Background:
Flow-controlled ventilation (FCV) represents a fundamentally different approach compared to conventional ventilatory modes. It actively regulates both inspiration and expiration using a constant, predefined flow, thereby stabilizing expiratory lung volume. Through this, FCV may influence respiratory mechanics, gas exchange, and intrathoracic pressures in ways that differ from conventional ventilation. However, its physiological effects and potential clinical benefits remain incompletely understood, and existing evidence is fragmented across experimental and clinical settings.
Methods:
We conducted a systematic review of preclinical and clinical studies comparing FCV with conventional ventilation. MEDLINE and CENTRAL were searched through May 2026. Key outcomes included ventilatory parameters, respiratory mechanics, measures of gas exchange, and hemodynamic effects. Due to study heterogeneity, results were synthesized qualitatively.
Results:
Ten preclinical and ten clinical studies were included. Preclinical studies consistently demonstrated lower respiratory rate and minute ventilation with FCV while maintaining or improving oxygenation and carbon dioxide control. Clinical studies were more heterogeneous. Six studies applied compliance-guided titration in FCV, whereas four used fixed or protocolized ventilation targets. Studies using compliance-guided titration in FCV generally reported lower respiratory rate and minute ventilation while maintaining carbon dioxide control, often accompanied by improved oxygenation. In contrast, studies using fixed ventilation targets demonstrated more variable physiological effects. No consistent adverse hemodynamic effects were reported. Overall, the certainty of clinical evidence was low to moderate.
Conclusions:
FCV may improve ventilatory efficiency and oxygenation without adverse hemodynamic effects. However, clinical evidence remains limited and heterogeneous, highlighting the need for standardization and larger trials.
Related Concept Videos
Factors Affecting Pulmonary Ventilation
Alveolar Surface Tension
The alveolar fluid lines the luminal surface of the alveoli and exerts a force called surface tension. This force is caused by the polar water molecules in the liquid being more strongly attracted to each...
Mechanical Ventilation III: Noninvasive Ventilation
Noninvasive Positive-Pressure Ventilation (NIPPV)
Mechanical Ventilation II: Invasive Ventilation
Negative-Pressure Ventilators
Negative-pressure ventilators create a vacuum around the chest or body to draw air into the lungs, simulating breathing. This method does not require an...
Mechanical Ventilation I: Indication and Settings
Physiological Control of Respiration
Breathing, a seemingly passive process, is regulated by the respiratory center in the brainstem. This center coordinates the involuntary control of respirations, which means it occurs without conscious effort, ensuring a smooth and uninterrupted pattern.
Regulation of Ventilation
The body maintains ventilation by monitoring levels of carbon dioxide (CO2), oxygen (O2), and hydrogen ion concentration (pH) in the arterial blood. Among these factors, the level of CO2 plays a crucial...
Respiratory Volumes and Capacities I
