Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 13, 2026

Intracellular Phosphoflow Cytometry of Acute Myeloid Leukemia Patient-Derived Xenotransplants
Published on: June 6, 2025
Mutational Landscape and Clonal Dynamics in AML Undergoing PTCy Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation
Marta Villalba1, José V Gil2, Juan Montoro3
1Hematology Department, Hospital Universitari i Politècnic La Fe, Valencia, Spain; Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria La Fe, Valencia, Spain.
Abstract:
To improve risk stratification, we performed targeted NGS at diagnosis in 191 patients with AML undergoing myeloablative allogeneic HCT with PTCy-based prophylaxis. We also investigated clonal evolution using paired diagnostic and relapse samples from 39 individuals. A total of 610 mutations were detected in 184 patients (96%), most commonly in FLT3 (26%), DNMT3A (25%), RUNX1 (24%), and NPM1 (19%). Sixteen unique fusion genes were identified in 35 patients, with KMT2A (43%) and core binding factor rearrangements (23%) being the most frequent. TP53 and WT1 mutations were strongly associated with adverse outcomes, whereas NPM1 retained favorable significance. RUNX1 co-mutations with SF3B1 or NRAS were associated with inferior survival. In an exploratory allelic analysis, multi-hit TP53 alterations, but not single-hit mutations, were associated with distinctly poorer OS, EFS, and relapse risk. Relapse involved mutational shifts in ∼70% of cases, with significant enrichment of WT1 and more modest increases in TP53, KRAS, ASXL1, NF1, and MECOM, while DNMT3A, TET2, and ASXL1 persisted stably. Neither acute nor chronic graft-versus-host disease was associated with molecular remodeling at relapse. Incorporating TP53 and WT1 into risk models, recognizing context-dependent effects of DNMT3A and RUNX1, and applying longitudinal genomic monitoring may help guide personalized strategies to prevent relapse. Extended abstract BACKGROUND Relapse remains the leading cause of treatment failure after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) for acute myeloid leukemia (AML), yet the genetic mechanisms underlying post-transplant relapse remain poorly understood, particularly in the era of post-transplant cyclophosphamide (PTCy). Characterizing the mutational landscape at diagnosis and the clonal evolution leading to relapse may improve post-transplant risk stratification and identify opportunities for personalized surveillance and intervention. OBJECTIVES To characterize the diagnostic mutational landscape, evaluate its prognostic significance, and investigate clonal evolution from diagnosis to relapse in AML patients undergoing myeloablative HCT with PTCy-based graft-versus-host disease prophylaxis. STUDY DESIGN We performed targeted next-generation sequencing (NGS) at diagnosis in 191 consecutive AML patients undergoing myeloablative allogeneic HCT with PTCy-based prophylaxis. Paired diagnostic and relapse samples were available for 39 patients to evaluate clonal evolution. RESULTS A total of 610 mutations were detected in 184 patients (96%), most commonly in FLT3 (26%), DNMT3A (25%), RUNX1 (24%), and NPM1 (19%). Sixteen unique fusion genes were identified in 35 patients, with KMT2A (43%) and core binding factor rearrangements (23%) being the most frequent. TP53 and WT1 mutations were strongly associated with adverse outcomes, whereas NPM1 retained favorable significance. RUNX1 co-mutations with SF3B1 or NRAS were associated with inferior survival. In an exploratory allelic analysis, multi-hit TP53 alterations, but not single-hit mutations, were associated with distinctly poorer OS, EFS, and relapse risk. Relapse involved mutational shifts in ∼70% of cases, with significant enrichment of WT1 and more modest increases in TP53, KRAS, ASXL1, NF1, and MECOM, while DNMT3A, TET2, and ASXL1 persisted stably. Neither acute nor chronic graft-versus-host disease was associated with molecular remodeling at relapse. CONCLUSIONS This study provides a comprehensive characterization of the mutational landscape and clonal evolution of AML undergoing contemporary PTCy-based allogeneic HCT. TP53 and WT1 identify patients at particularly high risk of post-transplant relapse, whereas NPM1 retains favorable prognostic significance. The frequent acquisition of new genetic lesions at relapse underscores the dynamic nature of post-transplant clonal evolution and supports longitudinal molecular monitoring together with genomically informed post-transplant surveillance and relapse-prevention strategies.

