Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 14, 2026

The Use of an Automated System (GreenFeed) to Monitor Enteric Methane and Carbon Dioxide Emissions from Ruminant Animals
Published on: September 7, 2015
The genetic relationships between different definitions of emissions outputs and feedlot production traits
M D Madsen1, T Granleese2, R Hergenhan3
1School of Environmental and Rural Science, University of New England, Armidale, NSW, 2351, Australia. Mette.Madsen@une.edu.au.
Background:
Selective breeding is a potential strategy for reducing methane (CH4) emissions in ruminants. In Australian beef cattle, large scale emission recording is currently being conducted using GreenFeed Emission Monitors (C-Lock Inc, USA). GreenFeeds repeatedly collect CH4 and carbon dioxide (CO2) spot-samples of varying duration on attending animals. This study used emission phenotypes from Australian feedlot beef cattle to compare variance components and predictive ability of 14 different datasets. The datasets differed in the minimum duration (two- or three minutes) required of spot-samples, and the minimum number of spot-samples (one, five, ten, 15, 20, 25 or 30) required of animals, to be included in the analysis. For each data requirement, variance components were estimated for trial average CH4 and CO2 production and CH4 efficiency traits, including residual CH4 adjusted for either feed intake, average daily gain or mid-test weight; CH4 intensity (CH4/mid-test weight); and CH4 yield (CH4/daily feed intake). This study also examined the genetic relationships between these emission traits and feed intake, liveweight and growth in Australian feedlot beef cattle.
Results:
Including animals with at least five spot-samples of two minutes or longer duration, when calculating trial average emission traits, performed as well as datasets with a higher minimum number of spot-samples, and better than datasets including animals with a lower minimum number of spot-samples. The required minimum duration of included spot-samples did not have systematic impacts on either variance components or predictive ability. Under the data requirement of a minimum of five, two-minute or longer spot-samples, the heritabilities of the emission traits were 0.24-0.43 (SE 0.06-0.08), with higher heritability of the emission production traits than the CH4 efficiency traits. Feed intake, live weight and growth were moderately positive genetically correlated to CH4 production (0.39-0.60, SE 0.08-0.14), moderately negative to moderately positive genetically correlated to the CH4 efficiency traits (-0.27 to 0.26, SE 0.08-0.19), and moderately to highly positive genetically correlated to CO2 production (0.54-0.88, SE 0.05-0.12).
Conclusions:
This study showed that requiring animals to have a minimum of five spot-samples of at least two-minutes duration are appropriate data requirements for the emission data currently available on Australian feedlot beef cattle. The results further showed that feed intake, growth and liveweight had the strongest genetic relationships with CO2 production, followed by CH4 production, and lastly the CH4 efficiency traits.
More Related Videos
09:09Protocol for Assessing the Relative Effects of Environment and Genetics on Antler and Body Growth for a Long-lived Cervid
Published on: August 8, 2017
08:29Measuring Liver Mitochondrial Oxygen Consumption and Proton Leak Kinetics to Estimate Mitochondrial Respiration in Holstein Dairy Cattle
Published on: November 30, 2018
Related Concept Videos
Evolutionary Relationships through Genome Comparisons
Production Efficiency
What is Population Genetics?
Heritability
Incomplete Dominance
Background and Environment Affect Phenotype
An example of how genetic background affects phenotype can be seen in horses. The Extension gene in horses is responsible for their coat color. A wild-type gene (EE) produces black pigment in the coat, while a mutant gene (ee) produces red pigment. A...