Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 14, 2026

Ultrasonographic Assessment During Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation
Published on: October 24, 2020
"Resuscitation on the go"- Musculoskeletal discomfort, CPR quality and provider experiences in a transit ambulance
Caroline Ashritha Maben1,2, Prithvishree Ravindra3, Abraham Samuel Babu4
1Department of Trauma Care Management, Yenepoya School of Allied Health Sciences, Yenepoya (Deemed to be University), Mangalore, Karnataka, India.
Background:
Performing high-quality cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) in a moving ambulance poses biomechanical and ergonomic challenges. This pilot study aimed to evaluate musculoskeletal discomfort, CPR quality, and provider posture, while exploring the experiences of healthcare providers delivering CPR in a moving ambulance.
Methods:
A mixed-methods study involving 30 Emergency Medical Service (EMS) providers and students aged 18-40 years trained in Basic Life Support was conducted. Participants performed CPR simulation in an in-hospital stationary setting and a moving ambulance using a Little Anne® QCPR mannequin (Laerdal Medical, Stavanger, Norway). Musculoskeletal discomfort was assessed before and after CPR in the moving ambulance using the Numerical Pain Rating Scale. CPR quality parameters, including compression score, depth, rate, recoil, and chest compression fraction, were recorded using the QCPR® app. Body posture was assessed using mean trunk and elbow angles during compression and recoil. Semi-structured interviews explored participants' experiences.
Results:
Median pain scores increased significantly after CPR in the moving ambulance [0 (0, 2.75) before vs. 4 (0, 6) after; p < 0.001]. The most common pain sites were the lumbar region and wrists. Chest compression score and good rate percentage were lower in the moving setting. Trunk and elbow angles showed greater flexion in the moving ambulance, with changes observed across consecutive CPR cycles. Qualitative analysis revealed themes of physical fatigue, balance issues, safety concerns, and ergonomic limitations. Participants recommended simulation-based training, improved ambulance design, and mechanical CPR devices.
Conclusion:
CPR in a moving ambulance was associated with increased musculoskeletal discomfort and lower CPR quality metrics. Ergonomic modifications, provider training, and mechanical aids may help address these challenges. Further studies with larger and more diverse populations and real-world transport conditions are warranted.
Trial Registration:
Prospectively registered in Clinical Trial Registry India (CTRI/2024/09/073482) on September 5th, 2024.
Related Concept Videos
Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation I: Adult
Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation III: AED Use
Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation IV: Pharmacological Management
Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation II: ACLS Airway Management
Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation V: Advanced Airway Management Techniques
Assessment of Airway, Skin Color, and Use of Accessory Muscles
Introduction
The initial evaluation of a patient's respiratory system...