Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 14, 2026

Technical Detail for Robot Assisted Pancreaticoduodenectomy
Published on: September 28, 2019
Application of the Omaha System-Based Nursing Model in the Perioperative Care of Patients Undergoing
Haiyan Wang1, Zhixuan Chen2, Xiaolu Fan3
1Department of Hepatopancreatic Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of USTC (Anhui Provincial Hospital), Hefei, Anhui Province, China; Faculty of Medicine, Institute of Nursing, University Malaya, Kuala Lumpur 50603, Malaysia.
Objective:
To evaluate whether a nurse-delivered perioperative clinical pathway operationalized through the Omaha System is associated with improved recovery outcomes after pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD).
Methods:
This single-center pilot study used allocation by admission sequence. Sixty-eight adults undergoing PD from February to September 2025 were allocated to routine perioperative nursing (control, n = 34) or routine care plus a nurse-delivered Omaha System-based pathway (observation, n = 34). Outcomes were time to first flatus, defecation, and ambulation; abdominal distension on postoperative days (PODs) 1, 3, 7, and 14; ISI and HADS scores at admission and POD 7; and postoperative complications. Continuous and repeated measures were analyzed using t tests and repeated-measures analysis of variance, respectively; the overall complication proportions were compared using a two-sided Fisher's exact test.
Results:
Compared with the control group, the observation group had shorter times to first flatus, defecation, and ambulation (all P < 0.05), lower abdominal distension scores on PODs 3 and 7 (P = 0.015 and P < 0.001), and lower ISI, HADS-A, and HADS-D scores on POD 7 (all P < 0.001). Complications occurred in 2/34 (5.88%) observation-group patients and 8/34 (23.53%) control-group patients; this descriptive difference was not statistically significant by two-sided Fisher's exact test (P = 0.083).
Conclusion:
The nurse-delivered Omaha System-based pathway was associated with faster gastrointestinal and mobility recovery and better sleep and psychological outcomes in this pilot sample. The lower observed complication proportion should be interpreted as a descriptive trend because the study was small, single-center, and not designed or powered for adjusted complication analyses. Larger multicenter randomized trials with implementation-fidelity monitoring are needed.
