Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 15, 2026

Midface Hypoplasia and Cranial Base Morphology in Syndromic Craniosynostosis: A Comparative Analysis Study Using a Predictive Regression Model
Published on: November 4, 2025
Household-level spatial modelling of child height-for-age in Northern Province, Rwanda: comparison of geographically
Clarisse Kagoyire1, Gilbert Nduwayezu2, Rachid Oucheikh3
1Department of Earth and Environmental Sciences, Lund University, Lund, Sweden; Centre for GIS and Remote Sensing, College of Science and Technology, University of Rwanda, Kigali.
Abstract:
Childhood stunting remains a major public health concern in low- and middle-income countries, with persistent sub-national disparities. This study examined spatially varying associations between Height-for-Age z-scores (HAZ) and selected child, maternal, and household factors, and compared Geographically Weighted Regression (GWR), Multi-scale GWR (MGWR) and Geographically Neural Network Weighted Regression (GNNWR) in their ability to capture spatial heterogeneity and non-linearity. We analysed data from a cross-sectional survey conducted in December 2021 in the Northern Province of Rwanda. The survey covered 615 households, with analyses performed for 601 children aged 1-36 months. After imputation, multicollinearity screening, and feature selection, HAZ was modelled using Ordinary Least Squares (OLS), GWR, MGWR and GNNWR. Model performance was assessed using coefficient of determination (R2), Root Mean Square Error (RMSE), Akaike Information Criterion/AIC Corrected (AIC/AICc), and Moran's I of residuals. Overall stunting prevalence was 27.1%. Spatially varying associations were observed for child age, sex, birthweight, underweight status, selected childcare practices, maternal support, and household living conditions. GNNWR achieved the best training performance (R2 = 0.66; RMSE=0.74) followed by MGWR (R2 =0.51; RMSE=0.88) and GWR (R2 =0.43; RMSE=0.95). Validation performance declined for all models, although GNNWR retained a higher validation (R2=0.28) with negligible residual spatial autocorrelation (Moran's I = -0.005). GNNWR provided the strongest overall fit among the compared models and highlighted local spatial variation in associations with HAZ. However, the modest validation performance indicates that the findings should be interpreted cautiously. The workflow offers a portable framework for analysing DHS-like geocoded household datasets, but broader applicability should be assessed using spatial cross-validation, and sensitivity analyses.
Related Concept Videos
Regression Toward the Mean
Residuals and Least-Squares Property
If the observed data point lies above the line, the residual is positive, and the line underestimates the actual data value for y. If the observed data point lies below the line, the residual is negative, and the line overestimates the actual data value for y.
The process of fitting the best-fit...
Coefficient of Correlation
If you suspect a linear relationship between x and y, then r can measure how strong the linear relationship is.
What the VALUE of r tells us:
The value of r is always between –1 and +1: –1 ≤ r ≤ 1.
The size of the correlation r indicates the strength of the linear...
Regression Analysis
In regression analysis, a regression equation is determined based on the line of best fit– a line that best fits the data points plotted in a graph. This line is also called the regression line. The algebraic equation for the regression line is called the regression equation. It is represented as:
