Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 16, 2026

ADSC-sheet Transplantation to Prevent Stricture after Extended Esophageal Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection
Published on: February 10, 2017
Association between follow-up endoscopic inflammation and subsequent esophageal stricture formation after caustic
Yoo Kyoung Lim1, Heejoon Jang, Ji Won Kim
1Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul Metropolitan Government Seoul National University Boramae Medical Center, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Abstract:
The prognostic accuracy of initial endoscopic findings using the Zargar classification for long-term outcomes remains imperfect. We evaluated whether mucosal inflammation on follow-up endoscopy provides additional prognostic information regarding the risk of esophageal stricture requiring therapeutic intervention. We included 20 patients with corrosive esophagitis who underwent initial endoscopy within 48 hours of caustic ingestion and follow-up endoscopy at Seoul Metropolitan Government Seoul National University Boramae Medical Center between January 1, 2010, and August 30, 2025. The outcome was esophageal stricture requiring balloon dilation or stent insertion. Patients were categorized by the presence or absence of esophageal inflammation on follow-up endoscopy, defined by persistent caustic-related mucosal inflammatory or injury findings, including hyperemia, edema, erosions or ulcerations, friability or bleeding, exudates, clots, or necrotic changes. Firth penalized Cox regression was used to identify predictors of endoscopic intervention. Follow-up endoscopy was performed at a median of 13 (interquartile range, 7-29) days after the initial examination. Seven patients (35%) demonstrated inflammatory findings on follow-up endoscopy, while 13 patients (65%) showed no inflammation. All 4 patients requiring endoscopic intervention had sustained inflammation on follow-up endoscopy, whereas none without inflammation required therapeutic intervention. In multivariable analysis, inflammation on follow-up endoscopy was associated with an increased risk of requiring endoscopic intervention, although the estimate was imprecise, with a wide confidence interval (adjusted hazard ratio, 17.14; 95% confidence interval, 1.67-2308.65; P = .014). Initial Zargar classification grades were not significantly associated with the outcome. Sustained mucosal inflammation on follow-up endoscopy may provide additional prognostic information regarding the risk of esophageal stricture requiring intervention in corrosive esophagitis. These findings warrant validation in larger prospective cohorts.
Related Concept Videos
Esophageal Strictures-I: Introduction
Etiology
The primary cause of esophageal strictures is long-standing gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD), accounting for about 70 to 80% of adult cases. Chronic acid reflux can lead to injury and scarring of the esophageal lining, culminating in...
Esophageal Strictures-II: Clinical Features and Management
Healthcare providers should gather a comprehensive medical history and conduct a physical examination for diagnosis. If esophageal stricture is...
Barrett Esophagus-I: Introduction
This constant acid exposure transforms the esophagus's pink mucosal lining (stratified squamous epithelium) into a type of lining more similar...
Barrett Esophagus-II: Clinical Manifestations and Management
To diagnose Barrett's esophagus, healthcare providers often recommend an endoscopy for those showing symptoms of acid reflux. The procedure entails...
Esophageal Perforation-II: Clinical Manifestations and Management
Clinical Manifestations:
Esophageal Achalasia
