Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 16, 2026

Assessment of the Efficacy of An Osteopathic Treatment in Infants with Biomechanical Impairments to Suckling
Published on: February 5, 2019
Content Validation of the Prenatal Evaluation and Referral for Lactation (PEARL) Tool Using a Delphi Method
1Center for Prevention & Early Intervention Policy, Florida State University, 1339 E Lafayette Street, Tallahassee, FL 32301, USA.
Background:
Delayed onset of lactogenesis II or delayed secretory activation, defined as milk onset > 72 h postpartum, is a recognized barrier to successful breastfeeding initiation and duration. Prenatal identification and screening for risk factors associated with delayed secretory activation remains underutilized in maternal-child health services. This project aimed to develop and validate content for the Prenatal Evaluation and Referral for Lactation (PEARL) tool, a prenatal screening and referral instrument designed to identify lactation risk factors and guide anticipatory counseling and early referral to an International Board Certified Lactation Consultant (IBCLC) or breastfeeding medicine physician.
Methods:
Tool development was informed by a structured literature review conducted on 2 October 2024, across four databases (CINAHL, PubMed, Scopus, and Embase), identifying clinical and other health factors associated with delayed lactogenesis II. A three-round Delphi process was used to establish content validity through multidisciplinary expert consensus. Item-level content validity (ICV) was evaluated using a predefined consensus threshold (≥0.80), while average-measures Intraclass Correlation Coefficients (ICC) were calculated as a complementary assessment of interrater consistency. Following tool refinement, a pilot implementation training was conducted to obtain preliminary feedback regarding clarity, usability, and implementation.
Results:
Twelve lactation experts were selected from 59 eligible respondents to participate in the Delphi process. Most of the proposed items achieved the predefined content validity threshold (ICV ≥ 0.80) across the first two Delphi rounds, resulting in refinement and consensus on the final PEARL instrument. Interrater reliability improved from moderate agreement in Round 1 (ICC = 0.769; 95% CI 0.425-0.953) to excellent agreement following refinement in Round 2 (ICC = 0.911; 95% CI 0.787-0.979). Qualitative feedback informed revisions to item wording, organization, and content. A pilot implementation training indicated that the tool was perceived as understandable, usable, and appropriate for prenatal practice.
Conclusions:
The PEARL demonstrated strong evidence of content validity and preliminary implementation feasibility as a standardized prenatal lactation screening tool. Future research should evaluate additional psychometric properties, implementation outcomes, and prospective clinical performance to determine its effectiveness in improving referral practices and breastfeeding outcomes.
Related Concept Videos
Formulating and Validating Nursing Diagnosis II
Risk nursing diagnoses represent clinical judgments of an individual, family, or community more vulnerable to developing the health problem than others...
Data Validation
Nursing assessment guides are generally based on holistic models rather than medical...
Development of the Oral Microbiota
Nursing Evaluation
Section...
Nursing Process for Patient and Caregiver Teaching I: Assessment and Diagnosis
It is critical to determine the patient's learning needs during the assessment. Determination of learning needs compounds data from the...
Nursing Process for Patient and Caregiver Teaching III: Evaluation and Documentation
Nurses can use several methods to evaluate patient outcomes. For example, oral questions can assess cognitive learning, patient...