Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 16, 2026

Measuring the Mechanical Properties of Glass Fiber Reinforcement Polymer Composite Laminates Obtained by Different Fabrication Processes
Published on: June 30, 2023
Effects of Glass Fiber Content on the Cellular Morphology and Mechanical Properties of Microcellular Injection-Molded
He Zhang1,2,3,4, Wei Guo1,2,3,4
1State Key Laboratory of Light Superalloys, Wuhan University of Technology, Wuhan 430070, China.
Abstract:
Glass-fiber-reinforced polypropylene (GF/PP) composite foams combine reinforcement with weight reduction, but how GF content governs the competition between cell refinement and foam expansion under fixed-cavity molding remains unclear. GF/PP composite foams containing 0-15 wt.% GF and a fixed 5 wt.% PP-g-MAH were prepared by fixed-cavity MuCell injection molding. Gas-free melt rheology, crystallization, cellular morphology, density, and mechanical properties were evaluated. Increasing GF content raised the apparent viscosity and shifted crystallization toward higher temperatures. The cell density increased from 6.12 × 104 to 1.56 × 107 cells cm-3, whereas the average cell diameter decreased from 264.5 to 27.1 μm. However, the expansion ratio peaked at 1.27 for GF9 and then decreased to 1.12 for GF15, showing that continuous cell refinement did not produce a monotonic improvement in foam expansion. These trends suggest competing effects of GF on cellular development: at low-to-intermediate contents, GF interfaces may favor heterogeneous nucleation, while increased melt resistance may suppress excessive cell growth and coalescence; at higher contents, fiber crowding, reduced interfiber spacing, geometric confinement, and interfacial heterogeneity may increasingly restrict cell growth and foam expansion. Although the absolute tensile and flexural properties increased with GF content, the density-normalized properties and impact strength varied nonmonotonically. GF9 exhibited the highest measured mean specific tensile, flexural, and impact strengths, together with a mean impact strength of 24.4 kJ·m-2, which was 32.6% higher than that of GF0. Thus, cell refinement alone does not ensure improved lightweight efficiency; an intermediate GF content provides the most favorable balance among cellular refinement, foam expansion, and fiber reinforcement.
More Related Videos
07:56Preparation of Carbon Fiber and Bamboo Fiber Reinforced Poly (butylene Adipate-co-terephthalate) Foams by Supercritical Carbon Dioxide Foaming
Published on: October 10, 2025
09:06The Effect of Construction and Demolition Waste Plastic Fractions on Wood-Polymer Composite Properties
Published on: June 7, 2020
Related Concept Videos
Fiber Reinforced Concrete
Molecular Weight of Step-Growth Polymers
As the step-growth polymerization involves step-wise condensation of monomers, the molecular weight also builds up eventually. Consequently, high molecular weight polymers are obtained at the late stages of the polymerization, where 99% of monomers have been consumed.
The extent of the...