Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 16, 2026

Reliability of Artificial Intelligence-Based Cone Beam Computed Tomography Integration with Digital Dental Images
Published on: February 23, 2024
Deep Learning-Based Identification of Dental Implant Systems from Two-Dimensional Radiographs
Alparslan Esen1, Mustafa Üstün1
1Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Faculty of Dentistry, University of Necmettin Erbakan, 42090 Konya, Turkey.
Abstract:
Background/Objectives: Dental implants are a reliable treatment for tooth loss, but identifying the implant brand when patient records are unavailable remains a clinical challenge that complicates prosthetic repair and complication management. This study aimed to develop and evaluate a deep learning-based system for automated identification of dental implant brands from panoramic and periapical radiographs. Methods: In this retrospective study, anonymized radiographs containing implants of twelve known brands were obtained from the archives of Necmettin Erbakan University Faculty of Dentistry. A two-stage pipeline was employed: a YOLOv11 detector first localized and cropped the implant regions, after which an EfficientNetV2-M convolutional neural network, fine-tuned via transfer learning, classified the implant brand. Class imbalance was addressed through offline and online data augmentation. Results: On the held-out test set of 531 implant crops spanning twelve brands, the classifier achieved an overall accuracy of 96.23% (95% CI 94.5-97.7%), a macro-averaged F1-score of 0.953, and a macro-averaged ROC-AUC of 0.991; the complete pipeline evaluated end to end on detector-predicted crops reached 96.0% match-conditional implant-level accuracy, corresponding to a precision-aware end-to-end identification F1-score of 88.2% (precision 81.6%, recall 96.0%) when all predicted boxes, including false detections, were counted. Grad-CAM analysis, including misclassified and low-confidence cases, indicated that predictions were based on clinically meaningful implant morphology. Conclusions: These findings indicate that the proposed two-stage approach provides accurate and interpretable implant brand identification, supporting its potential as a clinical decision support tool.

